really? how odd. They haven't seemed cliquey to me at all. Then again I suppose that could be because I've only tagged with two of them, so I don't have the experience to say. Thank you for the information, though!
http://rpanons.dreamwidth.org/30158.html?thread=87731150#cmt87731150 the thread is here. no one said they were inactive, just that having a big cast doesn't excuse them from tagging out because only a small handful do enough in the game to be kept up with.
though some of the cast may have thread that thread, i have seen a couple of them tagging out more since it was made.
The numbers do not back you guys up. I'd hate to think I wasted my time counting because you guys want to ignore the facts so you have something to whine about.
and which numbers and facts are those? which characters? who were they threading with? when that thread in rpanons was made, 10 had only just intro'd which was said in the thread. 18 threads between 10 people? that's not a lot.
furthermore just because they were active in week 20 (and that doesn't mean they won't drop non-castmate threads) doesn't mean they were all throughout, and doesn't mean they're not cliquey. there are a few members of that cast who will pop up with brief spurts of activity and then drop them.
That or you're noticing them more because the thread made you think about them. LIke when you finally learn someone's name and suddenly realize how often your paths cross.
Re: EXITVOID
(Anonymous) 2013-05-01 12:35 pm (UTC)(link)ayrt
(Anonymous) 2013-05-01 07:04 pm (UTC)(link)da
(Anonymous) 2013-05-01 07:32 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-01 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)And that was just me eyeballing it.
How exactly is that either cliquey or inactive?
da
(Anonymous) 2013-05-01 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)Re: da
(Anonymous) 2013-05-01 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)As for cliquey, do you think those 18 threads were all cast-only? How many threads do you think they make?
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2013-05-01 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)you're coming off as extremely defensive btw
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2013-05-01 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)new anon
(Anonymous) 2013-05-02 06:51 pm (UTC)(link)though some of the cast may have thread that thread, i have seen a couple of them tagging out more since it was made.
da
(Anonymous) 2013-05-02 06:54 pm (UTC)(link)Re: da
(Anonymous) 2013-05-02 08:44 pm (UTC)(link)Re: new anon
(Anonymous) 2013-05-02 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)Re: new anon
(Anonymous) 2013-05-03 06:16 am (UTC)(link)furthermore just because they were active in week 20 (and that doesn't mean they won't drop non-castmate threads) doesn't mean they were all throughout, and doesn't mean they're not cliquey. there are a few members of that cast who will pop up with brief spurts of activity and then drop them.
Re: new anon
(Anonymous) 2013-05-03 06:02 pm (UTC)(link)Re: new anon
(Anonymous) 2013-05-03 02:50 pm (UTC)(link)