wankgate | The Eighty-Second

The Eighty-Second

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

I guess it's never been an issue with me then. I have plenty of people who do exactly that, but the thumbnail is so small you can't even see what's going on at all. So, I wouldn't say it's useless, it's not a problem unless you click it, which isn't the plurker's resposibility when they've given warning.

Has anyone even brought this issue up to this player? I know from personal experience he's pretty laid back with solving issues, especially small scale ones like this.

It might be a difference in plurk layouts. Some of them might make it easier to see images posted than others, you know? Or some people have better eyesight, who knows. Either way, it sounds like the person who mentioned it doesn't click the things, so.

Still seems like a weird/petty thing to wank on for me, like this really seems like such an easy thing to just say "Hey please don't put that in the top level" but then again this is wankgate. I dunno, I guess it just looks like a petty attempt to jab at the player over something that easily could have an innocent oversight on their end, and also completely unrelated to the topic at hand.

Eh. Personally I'd just remove the person rather than doing that. I'm not about to police what people plurk about, but I also have zero interest in seeing porn 24/7. People get uppity about being asked to not put things in top levels.

But the person actually doesn't post porn nearly as much as the other anons are implying, so whatever.

Do you have them on your list? They post porn pics at least once a day or at least every other day and sometimes multiple times a day.

They also said it's no big deal to put their nsfw under a cut and have since started doing it? So it really shouldn't be a bother to you any more. They were exceedingly cool about it.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

The Eighty-Second

ayrt

da

ayrt

ayrt

Re: ayrt

oa on this topic

da