to think this is paranoid, you would have to think that i'm afraid someone might be pissed off. that's not it. it's very hard to take an acquaintance seriously if this is how they deal with minor drama. (???????? my dad forgot to pay the cable bill L M A O ??????) it reads as immature buttrage.
context is important because it's usually obvious when someone is joking around. otoh there's been a high correlation between serious wankers i've known and people who habitually toss out "lmao"s at the beginning of their sentences, without the ?????????.
oh, ok. i never understood that i thought they were being passive aggressive towards me when i was unimpressed with their behavior while observing them talking about something that had nothing to do with me.
you said you L M A O reads as pissed off. It doesn't matter what your reaction to something is if you see it as something it probably isn't. Paranoia is suspicion or mistrust of people without justification or evidence. For you to eyeroll at someone using LMAO when it's not solely a pet peeve is you being paranoid. Your cover up was going great until you brought up your home-brewed correlation between wankers and using "lmao" at the front of sentences
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2014-06-27 06:40 pm (UTC)(link)L = I
M = AM
A = PISSED
O = OFF
????????? = !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the more question marks, the more enraged it looks.
context is important though
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2014-06-27 07:00 pm (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2014-06-27 07:47 pm (UTC)(link)to think this is paranoid, you would have to think that i'm afraid someone might be pissed off. that's not it. it's very hard to take an acquaintance seriously if this is how they deal with minor drama. (???????? my dad forgot to pay the cable bill L M A O ??????) it reads as immature buttrage.
context is important because it's usually obvious when someone is joking around. otoh there's been a high correlation between serious wankers i've known and people who habitually toss out "lmao"s at the beginning of their sentences, without the ?????????.
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2014-06-27 07:49 pm (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
truly you are wise and perceptive.
da
(Anonymous) 2014-06-28 08:05 pm (UTC)(link)backpedal better next time.
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2014-06-28 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)sorry about your incredibly shit comprehension skills.
Re: da
Re: da
Re: da
Re: da
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2014-06-28 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)get your own!
we should all meet up in the tumblr thread
Re: da
Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-28 23:06 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) 2014-06-27 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)paranoid, overanalyzing, and they reuse the same phrase over and over
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-28 07:11 pm (UTC)(link)you and the anon you're +1ing read too much into shit.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-28 08:17 pm (UTC)(link)context is important
no subject
no subject
my parent links are dead
no subject
my parent links are bread
no subject
my parent links are shred
edRe: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2014-07-01 08:52 am (UTC)(link)