wankasaurusrex (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
wankasaurusrex) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
wankgate2015-03-23 07:32 pm
wankasaurusrex) wrote in wankgate2015-03-23 07:32 pm
"stubborn". usually code for the player wanting their character to always be right or wanting special dispensation from the mods.
The problem is that we have some one like Ni as a mod in the first place. She is pretty terrible about keeping an ic/ooc divide, she is not at all impartial her friends get benefits and her enemies get shafted, and she holds grudges. All terrible qualities in an rper but doubly worse in a mod. She can be so petty about even minor issues on plurk it astounds me she has not been mentioned here long before now.
So take the problem to the other mods you say. That might work fine but if they happen to slip and reveal who complained to Ni then you are still never going to hear the end of it. You might as well drop if she decides she doesn't like you. I think people are underestimating the size of the problem here.
So take the problem to the other mods you say. That might work fine but if they happen to slip and reveal who complained to Ni then you are still never going to hear the end of it. You might as well drop if she decides she doesn't like you. I think people are underestimating the size of the problem here.
or, in smut, code for wanting someone to basically rape the character because they'll never give in, a.k.a. "consent"
it used to be "snarky" before that word kind of lost favor
now i'm not sure
now i'm not sure
it's almost like there's more than one anon in this thread and you're an idiot for thinking i brought up irl at all....
"brooding"
aka "my character is sitting in a corner looking like he wants to murder everyone, come bother him."
also "troll." always troll.
aka "my character is sitting in a corner looking like he wants to murder everyone, come bother him."
also "troll." always troll.
Teenagers have been having sex with each other for a long time, way before porn became accessible online. Teens have sex drives and their eager to grow up. That's fine. That's normal. (Well... having sex in the 6th grade isn't normal, but older high schoolers, yeah, that's been common for practically forever.)
However, I do agree that just because they're having sex with each other doesn't make it okay for adults to have sex with them or get excited imagining them having sex. Adults shouldn't be sexually interested in teenagers, because that's just weird. It doesn't matter if teenagers are sexually interested in each other. Adults aren't teens.
However, I do agree that just because they're having sex with each other doesn't make it okay for adults to have sex with them or get excited imagining them having sex. Adults shouldn't be sexually interested in teenagers, because that's just weird. It doesn't matter if teenagers are sexually interested in each other. Adults aren't teens.
name one player who's been name dropped or wanked on for playing f/f while male.
I've made specifications like that before - and it typically scares everyone off of ever responding to me.
It depends on what it is, but if it's like, "My character just broker their leg and is lying there on the ground," once one person responds, then yes it is used up. Anyone else responding either comes at the same time... at which point it only makes sense to multilog... or they're basically coming to an empty scene because the first person presumably took the other broken leg character to care.
Unless they just left them there, but no one knows that until the thread is finished. Timelines are't sacred, but I like it to make some sense.
Unless they just left them there, but no one knows that until the thread is finished. Timelines are't sacred, but I like it to make some sense.
captain america complimenting bucky on his lacy panty choice, my secondhand embarrassment for you guys is palpable
i swear to go that's like a neon blinking sign that says "i am obnoxious. please do not rp with me."
why do you care about what consenting adults do with each other? literally no real live children are involved at any point. fictional children do not need your protection.
Hey smutty dare meme person, you missed some Kevin journals, go stomp them out.
so our bucky is shit too? what a surprise. not.
rpers don't do it as much as canons, but "sexy."
Fellow male RPer here and I also find women to be better writers than us on the whole, though I'm not entirely sure if that's because they're just naturally more talented or just because so many writers in this hobby are women. Compounding this is that I don't often inquire as to the gender of whoever I'm writing off of, so a good half of the time I couldn't even tell you whether I'm writing off a guy or a girl.
Which leads to why I could only give you half a point: I mostly write M/M, and I find women to be just as good at the writing of it as men, despite what you'd tend to conclude offhand about that (i.e. a man knows what another man wants).
Which leads to why I could only give you half a point: I mostly write M/M, and I find women to be just as good at the writing of it as men, despite what you'd tend to conclude offhand about that (i.e. a man knows what another man wants).
"brilliant"
always a codeword for 'my character is smarter than i am and i can't write that convincingly so i'll just have him be a condescending fucknut instead
see: every riddler and sherlock holmes ever
always a codeword for 'my character is smarter than i am and i can't write that convincingly so i'll just have him be a condescending fucknut instead
see: every riddler and sherlock holmes ever
if you sexualize children, childhood, or adolescence, even fictionally, don't be surprised when people are grossed or creeped out
PM them?
also which journals are they? name and shame that shit
also which journals are they? name and shame that shit
these consenting adults are getting off to the idea of underage sex though.
to write something, you have to envision it: two adults are envisioning underage sex when they're writing it. they're writing child porn. it doesn't matter if they're fictional or not - many places would prosecute these consenting adults for it. off the top of my head, canada is an example where fictional child porn is still considered child porn.
to write something, you have to envision it: two adults are envisioning underage sex when they're writing it. they're writing child porn. it doesn't matter if they're fictional or not - many places would prosecute these consenting adults for it. off the top of my head, canada is an example where fictional child porn is still considered child porn.
Too lazy to make a sock. Pretty sure the Erza and Ryuko are his.
Page 89 of 204
- «
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- 122
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 127
- 128
- 129
- 130
- 131
- 132
- 133
- 134
- 135
- 136
- 137
- 138
- 139
- 140
- 141
- 142
- 143
- 144
- 145
- 146
- 147
- 148
- 149
- 150
- 151
- 152
- 153
- 154
- 155
- 156
- 157
- 158
- 159
- 160
- 161
- 162
- 163
- 164
- 165
- 166
- 167
- 168
- 169
- 170
- 171
- 172
- 173
- 174
- 175
- 176
- 177
- 178
- 179
- 180
- 181
- 182
- 183
- 184
- 185
- 186
- 187
- 188
- 189
- 190
- 191
- 192
- 193
- 194
- 195
- 196
- 197
- 198
- 199
- 200
- 201
- 202
- 203
- 204
- »
Page 89 of 204