wankgate | 134: reading comprehension optional

134: reading comprehension optional

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

ah, and there you go again. when facts fail you, you can always fall back on your one limitless resource: childish arrogance

/pats head

it's okay, anon. i know it stings not to be right about everything

facts? what facts? if you were using facts we wouldn't be having this discussion.

seriously. try to find one or two and maybe we can go on. or just state opinion as fact some more. that was better than the directionless monkey jabber you've had going on the last couple of comments.

come on, i know you can do it if you try. you managed a few interesting comments before you were reduced to this.

shhh, shh, shhh. i know, baby, i know. just let it all know.

i know it's hard to click that little link labeled (Parent) that takes you up to all your embarrassing failures but you can do it if you really try

go ahead, nonnie. i have faith in you

man, i have given you all the ammo in the world to make real remarks and effective personal jabs and used actual cited resources in my actual arguments about the base issue.

you're just disappointing and sad.

maybe someone with more than their brain stem functioning can pick up where you left off.

> actual cited resources

tumblr doesn't count as a resource lmao

no, but academic articles and materials from the time period in question does, sunshine.

can't find that parent link?

academic articles and materials which you have utterly failed to provide

and a radfem's vanity project doesn't count either snookums

radfem. lol

sorry, i tried to keep it simple and free for your broke ass. i know you're going to be shocked by this, but most studies and academic journals require money to view.

http://ahr.oxfordjournals.org/content/91/5.toc.pdf&sa=U&ei=qYRfU7ruN-Pn8AHM_4CgCA&ved=0CD4QFjAH&usg=AFQjCNHJ7wJVQ_fxoKKRAD6U1TokqCEIqg

you'll have to register and pay to gain access and we know you'll use that as an excuse not to read the big words, but there were a couple of anons here who seemed both intelligent and employed who might find it a useful resource.

lots of links.

specific ones?

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02192822 this one's interesting,in spite of buzzwords in the title.

http://books.google.com/books?id=8mJN7pcpERAC&dq=lgbt+history+academic+article+1920s&lr=
this isn't academic, but it's interesting and the preview covers a lot for free.

http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=N195DslIA98C&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=lgbt+history+academic+article+1920s&ots=-1ZoHrImlP&sig=zPjCqCivtbl6PUoJJxswCWYalIQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

this book's kind of useless in some ways but the list of cited sources is decent and extensive, for anons motivated to dig in deeper (yeah, right)

all of it'll give you a decent look at what homophobia actually looked like at various points in history. i didn't bother with the more specific shit dealing with socioeconomics, race, gender, and geography.

very impressive but none of this actually proves your point, it's just a random collection of literally the results of googling 'lgbt history'

yawn

it'd prove my point if you fucking read it. sorry you were too lazy to do your own google search though and too unemployed, broke and lazy to read it :( i only specifically linked things i'm familiar with and actually paid to read though.

it's okay, someday you'll grow up and have resources off line, but until then i'll just spoon feed you shit i think anons might have some hope of getting to.

except that i did read it and none of it proves your point because you don't actually have a point as you just admitted to all of us over on flatviewland

you're just a buttmad lesbian mad at the world for viewing you as the abomination you are and so you must troll wg to release some of your seething fury

it's okay, i understand. not everyone can be pretty and educated and well-adjusted. in lack of those things, you are at least very dedicated?

unless you read at the speed of light you didn't read shit. you can't even have gained access to them yet.

it's okay, we know the big words are scary.

unless i actually have these materials already and you're just regurgitating information i long ago consumed, processed and shat out

it's okay, i know talking to someone with actual education isn't something you're used to

yeaaaah, sure, okay. you convinced me.

just ignore them, they're a homophobe who's really mad about this for some reason

i know. i'm not worked up. i doubt they are either. homophobic and dumb sure but otherwise it's a troll trolling and me playing with them.

bitch i'm the one playing with you

it's okay that way too. as long as we're both having a good time.

i am, it's fun imagining the reactions of anyone trying to make sense of this

i am too! you stabbing around in the dark and failing to even get close is fun. it's like watching a game of pin the tail on the donkey, played by a bunch of drunk frat guys.

you're okay people anon. i might even like you if you weren't a piece of junk-waving cishet scum

you're just a buttmad lesbian mad at the world for viewing you as the abomination you are

oh my god lol

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

134: reading comprehension optional

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH