Re: worst headcanon/fanon you've ever seen

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 06:43 pm (UTC)(link)
my favorite is that Dean's super bisexual, guys, but daddy tried to beat the gay out of him so that's why he can't show his twoo wuv to Cas in any way but subtle manly glances

Re: Temple Gates

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 06:45 pm (UTC)(link)
a long, long time ago, anon. i'm almost 40 and middle age has been in the 50's for as long as i can remember.

you know, except for 13 year old kids who think 40 is near death.

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)
i've just ignored any tag from connie i've ever gotten. works like a charm.

Re: MODS' PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 06:47 pm (UTC)(link)
but, but, complaints are always true! that's what wg tells me!

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 06:47 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm glad i'm not the only one who sideeyes berry and the katamaris. the katamaris especially piss me off because any time any big plot happens, within a day there's a big post on the network from one of them explaining the whole thing and just infodumping the ooc info post. i always just pretend my character didn't see it or else pretty much every plot would be ruined.

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 06:51 pm (UTC)(link)
the worst offender of that is gone too. whoever played robin and fluttershy couldn't give hooks or move a thread along to save their life. i'd give them a hook every single tag and they'd almost always come back with "haha yeah lol" or the equivalent. it was unbearable. honestly the quality has taken a marked turn for the better recently and the low-quality people still in-game are pretty easy to ignore.

Re: Temple Gates

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 06:53 pm (UTC)(link)
once the life expectancy of humans went up from the 60s

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_age

Re: MEDIETAS

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 07:02 pm (UTC)(link)
okay so. do that? fail to see how this is wankworthy.

come to that i have yet to see a single good reason for shitting on this game. startin to think y'all just saltier than the dead sea.

+1

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 07:03 pm (UTC)(link)
mute and unfollow buttons exist for a reason.

Re: THE WALKING DEAD

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 07:08 pm (UTC)(link)
my bets are on abe.

i guess i'm a minority in that i actually liked the finale tho.

Re: THE WALKING DEAD

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 07:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I liked it, I'm just upset they left it on a cliffhanger like that. None of the actors seem to know who died either, so they have to wait until they get the script for the season primere to find out if they still have a job beyond one or two episodes /scenes. And that's pretty crappy.

Re: Temple Gates

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 07:15 pm (UTC)(link)
are you 12?

Re: PEDRO

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)
"had to retcon the character into not being the character" might just be the most hilarious solution I've ever heard to a characterization issue.

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 07:28 pm (UTC)(link)
in theory? sure. but games with no ac have shown that with no ac people barely play at all.

and even if that wasn't the case, learn to parent the fuck up. "person decided they had issues with AC requirements being too strict. person is now bitching about how people aren't bothering to play". i'm responding to that.

Re: Selwyn

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 07:34 pm (UTC)(link)
They clearly didn't think she'd done anything recent, judging by their reaction when a lot of folks handed them a treasure trove of screencaps and pastebins of her behavior among the new TFA crowd

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 07:36 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm one of the anons above and i don't know anyone here

i'm just amazed there's a sex game that's not full of under 20s

Re: PEDRO

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 07:36 pm (UTC)(link)
i hate that i actually remember this

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 07:37 pm (UTC)(link)
clearly

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 07:40 pm (UTC)(link)
good for you

Re: THE WALKING DEAD

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 07:46 pm (UTC)(link)
i loved the finale! i was on the edge of my seat the entire time. but i hated the ending. i'm fully aware of how silly it is to be butthurt over a tv show, but this was the most important moment in the series and they cut half of it out. it sucks.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 07:47 pm (UTC)(link)
there is a person on my tl who never comments on my plurks but who clicks like on at least 50% of them

i keep thinking i should remove them because we haven't talked or shared a game in ages, and then... i plurk, and within an hour, they've liked it.

are they just the world's least coordinated plurk muter? are they engaged in a bizarre, silent, months-long attempt to pressure me into paying attention? i just can't tell, and it's starting to skeeve me out.

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 07:48 pm (UTC)(link)
you sure have a lot of pent up rage of the idea of somebody playing an old dude as gay

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 07:51 pm (UTC)(link)
or it's someone who doesn't realize that plurk is not tumblr/facebook/twitter and that you don't need to like everything as a sign that you approve of what someone is saying, like you do on other social media sites.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 07:51 pm (UTC)(link)
they're probably just letting you know they're reading/keeping up with you even though you guys don't talk

+1

(Anonymous) 2016-04-04 07:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Contra the anon above, while totally lacking AC is a great way to fill your game with people who want to hold a spot and talk with their friends about the cool stuff their characters are totally doing together without ever writing a tag, I think you're right that AC shouldn't be used to force activity.

AC works great for sweeping complete flakes and ensuring that people who idle out stay gone, but I think the most effective combination for promoting activity is a moderate AC + meaningful activity rewards. There has to be something to get people to play, as well as something to sweep people who don't.