Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay so when your girlfriend/boyfriend dies you tell me how it goes when you decide you should fuck their niece. Because that is essentially what he is doing. It is creepy on the principle of fucking down generations, not the relationship in general.

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:46 pm (UTC)(link)
creepy is one thing.

you said "OMG ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING" like he was fucking his own neice.

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:48 pm (UTC)(link)
No I didn't? I said it was creepy from the start. Sorry some of us find it weird to "keep it in the family".

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:50 pm (UTC)(link)
some of you are stupid.

if he was keeping it in his own family, you would have a point, but this way, you just look like an idiot.

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Can't even make a joke on wg anymore without it going over someone's head. You are way too dedicated to this ship, anon.

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:02 pm (UTC)(link)
i see what you're trying to do, but you're flailing so hard at it, you're just making this even funnier.

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:06 pm (UTC)(link)
i have no horse in this race but why are you repeatedly bringing up incest

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:08 pm (UTC)(link)
because they need to win the anon slap fight and are desperate

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:12 pm (UTC)(link)
whatever you say, moral panic anon

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)
because the only way it would be creepy or disgusting would be if it was incest.

since it's not, all this moral panic is stupid.

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Nope. Still 100% weird. I am not about to continue dating someone if i find out they are my ex's niece.

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:18 pm (UTC)(link)
that's you and your own weird tittybabyism.

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:49 pm (UTC)(link)
you all are putting way too much weight on the ust steve and peggy had. one kiss. that's all they had. a kiss. and years in between him and anyone/thing else, even conscious ones where he wasn't frozen. so, you know... get over it.

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:54 pm (UTC)(link)
No, i will not get over it and the headcanon Steve remained a virgin even with Peggy is bogus. They had plenty of time to bang. Anyway, this has nothing to do with Peggy and more to do with how creepy it is to date someone's family member after they die. Nothing you say is going to erase that they are still related and it is even creepier considering the implications of Steve REPLACING Peggy with someone else who SHARES HER LAST NAME and happens to be related to her and happens to be as badass of an agent as she was.

Like what is wrong with you? I don't like the ship and I think it isn't justified.

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:59 pm (UTC)(link)
except you're the one stretching your headcanon out and that kiss as he got in the carrier was the first kiss they had. it held significance to it and it's why missing out on the date was such a big deal for him. if you can't get that from the movie and the context of it, that's your issue, not anyone else's. secondly, his interest in sharon started way before he ever had any notion of there being a familial tie. they're 'of an age', they were in proximity and had the same work deal going on, and while he was pissed at her, clearly he got over it.

steve didn't replace peggy. he got past the memory and fantasy of what could have been. that it was sharon was just a weird twist of fate. i also don't like the ship, but there's no reason to bring 'trying to bang the whole carter family' into it when that's not the case. i'm sorry that you can't understand that people, even fake ones, can have a 'type'. steve like strong, dominant women. good place to find that is in the military or agencies like SHIELD. like, wow. you're clinging really hard to it being some creepy intentional move, like he was stalking the carter family and just notching his belt with each carter vag he plugged. not the case.

i won't argue whether steve is/isn't a virgin, since we have no idea what happened in his life beyond 'waiting for the right girl' and if that carried over post serum during his uso days, but i can pretty much guarantee that he and peggy never got that far. so, you know, sorry if you're a peggy player and you're using that as headcanon to justify some oc that's a peggy/steve secret love child, but no.

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:00 pm (UTC)(link)
lolno

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 05:40 pm (UTC)(link)
It's really bizarre because basically every comic fan I've known my entire life agrees it's an awful ship that should have never happened for a ton of reasons. So either MCU fans are literally the worst fucking dumb babies who love literally the worst female characters probably as lip service because badass women!! While fapping over all the dudes and shipping them or comic folk are trolling.

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 06:41 pm (UTC)(link)
mcu fans are the worst

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 07:30 pm (UTC)(link)
who is mcu the worst if they also hate sharon/steve but for different reasons? anons in these threads never make sense.

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)
there's a ton of shit from the comics that doesn't at all translate here though, and most comics sharon haters i've ever encountered justify it in toxic as fuck ways. sharon carter is a historically maligned comics character, but that says more about comics fans than sharon herself.

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-08 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
the point is though that most of the people who've been in this thread don't like the ship. no one really does like sharon/steve that much. the argument is over the why. dislike the ship if you want, but don't try to throw around your reason a pedophilia or incest or some other bullshit. even bringing 'but peggy' into it is bullshit since there was no peggy to but over. not in terms of actuality. it never happened. they both wanted it to, but it didn't.

that is what the arguing is over. there's maybe one/two steve/sharon shippers. the rest of us dislike the ship, but think a lot of people are being fucking morons by trying to claim shitty, unrealistic reasons for disliking it. you can dislike it. you don't need to try to make it 'problematic'.

Re: ITT: SHARON STANS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 07:53 pm (UTC)(link)
another casual reminder that peggy and steve never even dated