Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 03:55 pm (UTC)(link)
but this isn't about ONE plurk. one plurk is ok. there are people repluking EVERY FANDOM plurk

can you read the op

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 04:05 pm (UTC)(link)
EVERY fandom?

i call bullshit.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 04:08 pm (UTC)(link)
it's not. someone even made an anon plurk complaining about it and the answer "o-oh but my friends may need it!!!"

there are people who are just replurk-happy. thye usually are the kind of people who replurk every game plurk ever too, even if they aren't in it and isn't open apps/tdm

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 04:11 pm (UTC)(link)
so then go into the anon plurk and back up the op. 'make a plurk about the actual plurk and what it does. don't replurk every fucking fandom'. be proactive. or fucking pp them. "When you do this, it really bugs me."

and point out the game issue.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 04:16 pm (UTC)(link)
i pointed it out the game issue before and went ignored, so i know not to bother again

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 04:19 pm (UTC)(link)
then unfollow them. if someone was being this much of a pain in the ass on my timeline, that's what i'd do. i unfollow people for posting too much drama or real life stuff that i don't care about. even if it's rp related, if it's about games/fandoms i'm not in or don't care about, i'm muting. if that's all they're doing, i'm unfollowing.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 04:21 pm (UTC)(link)
i've unfollowed all the ones i could, but the two left are in my game, and one is a castmate. i wanna see plotting plurks.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 04:21 pm (UTC)(link)
they're the only cast member that has a plurk?

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 06:25 pm (UTC)(link)
i think anon meant "i unfollowed everyone guilty of doing this except for two people"

maybe their other castmates don't do that shit

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 07:09 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah this is what i meant

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 19:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 20:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-21 20:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-22 01:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-22 02:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 05:45 pm (UTC)(link)
unfollow them and check their plurks manually when you're settling in to rp. that's what i do with obnoxious cr, and it's pretty easy as long as it's only two or three people. it also helps if you keep notifs on in case one of them pings you.

da

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 04:13 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm just glad they're plurking something actually rp related.

my timeline keeps getting filled with people replurking psa's, online panhandling, clickbait articles, sjw bullshit, etc.

at least this is rp related.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 04:42 pm (UTC)(link)
people using a microblogging site for microblogging? the horror!

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 04:47 pm (UTC)(link)
keep the tumblrina shit to tumblr

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)
plurk isn't just for rp and has never been just for rp. get your tits out of a twist about it, or unfollow.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 05:04 pm (UTC)(link)
so let me get this thread straight.

reblogging something someone might want to see, because we're all here for the same reason is right out, but reblogging tumblrina shit that only people tumblrinas want to see is totally ok.

right

sa

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 05:06 pm (UTC)(link)
minus the "people".

it helps if i delete what i wrote before i decide to rewrite it.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 09:26 pm (UTC)(link)
believe it or not, anon, there are people on plurk that don't rp and just use it as an alternative to twitter

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 09:46 pm (UTC)(link)
and why would they have any relevance to this thread at all?

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 09:30 pm (UTC)(link)
so basically you have no reading comprehension whatsoever. got it.

fhlk gkele fgtlfheg, vhky?

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 05:48 pm (UTC)(link)
there's a fine line between microblogging and just spamming

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 05:52 pm (UTC)(link)
also, online panhandling isn't microblogging. it's begging for money.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 09:31 pm (UTC)(link)
too bad plurk doesn't have a mute or unfollow feature...oh, wait.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)
"ugh don't reblog plurks from rp most wanted"
"i know right! just follow the account! idiots!"

"at least it's not online begging"
"OMG HOW DARE YOU! JUST MUTE OR UNFOLLOW!"

the fuck is going on here?

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-07-21 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
it's almost like there are a slew of different anons responding in this thread to different things, or are you one of those who thinks everyone else but you and one other person is magically the same anon?