Made By Me really is a perfect storm of stupid. see if you can count how many ways in this comment alone. i'll give you a freebie: he's tagged this character a few times now and been ignored each time.
what's the deal with people who post "deets" about people they hate with absolutely no proof and act like you're on their enemy's side if you don't instantly believe them and parrot their deets as if they're fact?
this isn't isolated to dw, this is common anywhere with internet wank.
though i can't count how many times i've asked for deets or posted deets here and been accused of being certain people. once i posted a pastebin of someone's PUBLIC plurk (not pre-linked on wg) and the plurker whined that it had to have been that one asshole they JUST had a fight with. LMAO.
ok, so let's say there's a twitter user who harasses people who say negative things about lady gaga and tells them that they're fat legbeards who should kill themselves. there's never been a loginfail or anything, but people just assume that it's gaga under a sock because it's a brand new account with no personal details.
the "secret wanker" in question is almost always someone who's guaranteed to have batshit whiteknight fans/friends/both, but nah, son, there's no way it CAN'T be the famous person in question! even if "gaga" is one of those celebrities who has never had any big drama (being weird and wearing meat dresses doesn't count), CLEARLY "gaga" is just a stealth diva who's rly good at hiding what a sociopath she is and is probably secretly the zodiac killer too. [citation fucking needed]
very rarely will anyone have actual "proof" and it'll almost always be reaching bullshit like "they both posted within the same hour!" even if the twitter user posts shit while lady gaga's asleep or in the middle of the concert, there's always some bs reason like "gaga hired someone to use her sock so it would give her an alibi." the twitter user could claim to live in brazil and use portuguese but there will always be people who theorize that "gaga just hired a translator to throw people off." please take your god damn meds.
if they're REALLY fucking stupid and desperate, they'll say the twitter user's name being coincidentally being steve (gaga's real name is stefani) or them both liking the same flavor of tea is PROOF!!!!!!! because gaga's got a fucking monopoly on names like that.
and none of these crazy fucks will ever consider this very possible fact: maybe it's not gaga or a gaga fan at all, maybe they could be a troll trying to make gaga or her fans look bad.
can someone explain to me why people like spn_gossip anons theorize that certain pairs of celebs are ttly in love but feel the need to hide their gay homo love by getting into "fake" het marriages and having children?
some anons on FFA are talking about how Denise was apparently a wanker in... the early 00's? are you fucking kidding me?
anyway, assuming that a wanker grows the fuck up and stops behaving in the way that got them labeled a wanker, at what point are their deets "crusty"?
if it depends on circumstances such as whether they were just an asshole or if they ruined someone's life or whether they were 8 or 18, please specify.
ps. lol at the anon who says "Russia is less scary than Denise!" yeah, wg, someone who might have been an asshole on the internet over 10 years ago is much worse than a government that's been corrupt for a long time.
Re: At what point do deets about internet drama become "crusty"?
two people put in an application for the same person. game doesn't accept challengers.
person 1 had the character originally reserved, but it expired. they sent in their application first. person 2 reserved the character after person 2. they sent in their application second.
soooo, who would rightfully get to app in that character?
let's face it anon, most (not all, but most) people in this hobby are here because they're social misfits who have been driven out of every conceivable irl form of social interaction and they're such miserable shut-ins that their issues color everything they play, full stop
there's degrees of course, not everyone is beautifulsavages blaming denise for her cornucopia of mental maladies, but i get depressed sometimes thinking how many of the people i know in this hobby who really ought to be going to therapy instead (some of them i even count as kinda-sorta friends because they ARE good writers, but they really do need actual therapy and not self-medication via rp)
hm, i dunno. it's right on the lines for my personal rules about historical figures, seeing as elizabeth ii, philip, charles, etc. are still alive, but it's from a long time ago, so... maybe, maybe not?
Page 4 of 4