Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 12:59 am (UTC)(link)
honest question, do you think the mods' job is to handhold everyone through everything, ic and ooc? proactivity is good. this was helpful.

it's kinda sad that ppl squint at something as innocuous as a plotting post on the ooc com because it "makes them look like a mod liaison" lmao. maybe i'm old, but we used to do this shit all the time back in the day.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
also, mods can literally still do a big writeup if they want and were planning to. it's not like they can't? threads are still going and questions are still asked so i can see them waiting a minute.

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
alternatively, if posting duplicate characters to a meme bothers you that much, go find some obscure canon to play from in which you're the only person on dreamwidth ever or whip up an oc.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
This is my new fav copypasta

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
anon is reaching, but "this only happened because the mods are bad, actually" is also reaching.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
you have to know how a comment like this translates to "please feed me all the plot, i don't want to be proactive, i just want to react to things mods write", right?

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 01:42 am (UTC)(link)
da, the mods already added an important question that went up while the post was being put together, tbh they seem fine just adding stuff to the existing post.

there's definitely a timing factor to consider, like when is too soon (or too late) to do a post like this, and that's really hard to figure, but it feels like pure wankgate brainworms to see all of this and read it as wank (if not outright headcanoning) on the part of the player OR the mods.

the player didn't do anything wrong. neither did the mods. neither of them seem bothered by what the other is doing. people are making up scenarios in their heads where this is somehow drama.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
i have no horse in this race but my god anons were NOT kidding about jigokucho whiteknights

+1

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
the dogpiling in here over what was a pretty milquetoast comment is fucking embarrassing.

though i can't say i'm surprised, given who's in the game and who made the post. way to reinforce the stereotype, guys.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
not the game but it was an insane comment

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:13 am (UTC)(link)
If this is how people react when a player is proactive ooc, imagine how people will act when they’re proactive ic and start getting results.

This is why no one wants to do anything in games and this is why nothing gets done in games without mods spoon feeding everyone plot like babies.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
Deets

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:28 am (UTC)(link)
anon, the comment was making olympic long jumper style leaps.

also i know we're on wankgate but pointing out misinformation isn't the same as whiteknighting.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:43 am (UTC)(link)
pointing out misinformation is valid

pointing it out 500 different times is unnecessary and yes, does start looking defensive when you're not adding anything to the discussion other than performative HOW VERY DARE!!! reactions, as if this person ran over your dog as opposed to just having a dumb take on wg

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:47 am (UTC)(link)
the whiteknights have been rabid since day one. it's fascinating.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:54 am (UTC)(link)
i know that way back in the day luceti used to have an entire character-run information network where characters would share information with each other in a format not accessible to the captor npcs, hold meetings/town halls, etc.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:54 am (UTC)(link)
"people are making up scenarios in their heads where this is somehow drama."

/thread, right here.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
i hear everyone in jigokucho smells like butts and farts

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 03:43 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt

this kind of response to bad takes happens all the time on wankgate tho

why does this specific dogpile get you up in arms

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
nobody's up in arms the dogpilers just look obnoxious and aren't helping the rep jigoku already has for having whiteknights

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 03:53 am (UTC)(link)
but again

dogpiling is normal on wankgate, it’s wankgate, you can’t even be sure most of the people responding are in the game

tbqh too none of the comments to that comment looked defensive of the game as “mods shouldn’t have to spoonfeed plot” debate is a pretty common debate around here

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
better that they do it here than in my game

go ahead. protect the honor of your precious game

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 04:08 am (UTC)(link)
hi, i'm the anon who doesn't go to this game and was asking about the situation.

to me, as someone who only looked at the link because someone linked it here, outside of every piece of context, this reads like someone saying that a plot was too vague and like they thought the game needed a summary of current events. you guys are talking about it on the level of someone running a player plot where they go spelunking in some mysterious mines. so this isn't actually someone revising an event post or something? is it a writeup where they're asking people to collab with them?

I still feel like I'm missing context. maybe it's the tone of the thing, I don't know.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 05:14 am (UTC)(link)
it's a writeup of things that were revealed through the plot posts

what's hard

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 05:29 am (UTC)(link)
you're pretty sensitive if this seems out of the ordinary to you.