Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:06 pm (UTC)(link)
i don't think anyone is mad so much as annoyed that eski is clearly plugging her own post here and summoning a bunch of people to her defense when it wasn't even necessary as almost everyone was in agreement that OP was reaching with their observations

which really weren't all that offensive to begin with, just dumb, but you had people screeching OMG WTF HOLY SHIT YOU'RE SO INSANE

i get that we're thirsty for wank but this was making mountains out of molehills so yeah eski and her friends should probably chill out tbh

Re: worst behavior you have seen from RPers IRL

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:11 pm (UTC)(link)
don't forget the friend was going through her mother dying at the time

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:17 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm not even in the game and i have no idea who eski is so wg is also being hyperdefensive of anyone being defensive

everyone here is making mountains out of molehills

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:21 pm (UTC)(link)
always wondered what it would look like if someone was a celebrity stalker over a nobody

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:29 pm (UTC)(link)
not for nothing anon but this whole thread started when it was pretty late where eski lives. since the post went up, she only linked it once on discord and her plurk. i don't think she's stupid enough to link her own post on wankgate either.

i think she made her post and some jigoku whiteknight linked it to defend the game's honor. instead they ended up dragging an unrelated player on wg and summoning a bunch of whiteknights that made her and the game look bad.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:36 pm (UTC)(link)
please remember that "hi x" on wankgate is wrong 99% of the time and you are not the exception

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:38 pm (UTC)(link)
+1 everyone should just sit here stewing in impotence and anonymity like me

+1

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:39 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm pretty sure this is the same jigokucho whiteknight who has been jumping down people's throats for bringing up issues with the game. "maybe you should be asking different questions?" is the same condescending tone they used to call people out for not reading.

good job giving wg a different name to latch onto though. you're so bad at whiteknighting your own game.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:41 pm (UTC)(link)
this. wgers are super cagey about the bullshit they trot out here as wank because there is nothing left

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)
my take away is that a lot of jigokucho players go here and they are all delusional

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:45 pm (UTC)(link)
at this point it doesn't matter if eski was involved or not, the game (and by extension the player) looks bad because a few anons decided that frothing at the mouth over a nonissue was a good idea. i guarantee you nobody would've cared otherwise if they laid off and left it alone.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:47 pm (UTC)(link)
And this is why the whiteknights need to stop.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:52 pm (UTC)(link)
which really weren't all that offensive to begin with, just dumb, but you had people screeching OMG WTF HOLY SHIT YOU'RE SO INSANE

This. I admittedly rolled my eyes a little at the comment but acting like this person was RP Hitler for suggesting that maybe a player should've given the mods a heads up is kind of ridiculous. I don't think it would've blown up like it did if the tone wasn't disproportionately incendiary.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 03:13 pm (UTC)(link)
youre the froth

Re: What's Your Score?

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 03:24 pm (UTC)(link)
nothing for posting wank that brought down a game either, goddamn

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 03:42 pm (UTC)(link)
"screeching OMG WTF HOLY SHIT YOU'RE SO INSANE"

is this a disproportionately incendiary tone

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 03:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Reactions like "are you genuinely insane" and "what the fuck" are a little extreme for what was actually posted, yes. I'd also concur that "it was a good post by a good player and you should feel bad for saying it was bad" was not a point that needed to be made over and over again.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 04:01 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think it's a lot so much as a couple of very loud dipshits.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 04:14 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah i think this is exactly what's going on, just a few morons being hyperdefensive over the equivalent of a mild peeve.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 04:29 pm (UTC)(link)
you didn't answer the question, which is suggestive

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 04:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Really kinda sick you think the bible should be part of public education.

And video game or bible it's all fantasy fiction written by repressed white men.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 04:51 pm (UTC)(link)
this circlejerk is just a different circlejerk from the one that was happening before lmfao

you all look bad

+1

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 04:53 pm (UTC)(link)
🤔

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 04:54 pm (UTC)(link)
here's the thing

if anons are not in the game then they don't care if the game looks bad. idk when you guys are gonna figure this out

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 05:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Next time try bass pro shops, their employees can help you pick out better quality bait.