Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 09:58 am (UTC)(link)
because people are mad someone is popular for being friendly and active.

i knew as soon as the post went up that they'd get wanked on and it would blow up. she has a lot of friends too so of course she'd have whiteknights too which isn't helping. the best thing they can do is stop talking.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 10:12 am (UTC)(link)
+1 it's resentment, you can tell from the tone of "not surprised based on who made the post" (and no i don't know this bitch from Adam)

also wgers are just weird miserable little people who enjoy taking the worst faith read of everything they see

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 11:31 am (UTC)(link)
Is this person popular?

I do not know who this person is. Wank history?

Is this who people are talking about when they ask how to get "popular" in rp?

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 11:53 am (UTC)(link)
they're active and friendly and people including the mods have thanked them for their post publicly so they're easy to hate if you're the type of player that compares yourself to everyone else which is a problem in faction games.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 12:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Sa, fresh from checking Google. People have been going "hi eski" so I checked for a previous blowup.

https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/33088.html?thread=123301184#cmt123301184

I didn't find any wrongdoing on eski's part, but I did find at least one anon calling her out for not tagging them. Have they been holding on to this grudge for 3+ years?

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 12:49 pm (UTC)(link)
you can be the most benign rper on dreamwidth and some rando will still hate you for eating crackers or forgetting a tag 3 years ago so yeah probably

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 12:54 pm (UTC)(link)
this isn't even the same eski lol

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 01:02 pm (UTC)(link)
lol really? Then who is this person and why are anons assuming everyone knows and should be annoyed by them

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 11:45 am (UTC)(link)
it's more likely people are bored and just jumping on the most active thread on flatview, anon

there's no real wank any more so some anons on here circle around any scraps like vultures even if they don't actually care or know anything about what's being said

just wait as soon as there's another thread that blows up on flatview this one will be left behind because nobody really cares

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:06 pm (UTC)(link)
i don't think anyone is mad so much as annoyed that eski is clearly plugging her own post here and summoning a bunch of people to her defense when it wasn't even necessary as almost everyone was in agreement that OP was reaching with their observations

which really weren't all that offensive to begin with, just dumb, but you had people screeching OMG WTF HOLY SHIT YOU'RE SO INSANE

i get that we're thirsty for wank but this was making mountains out of molehills so yeah eski and her friends should probably chill out tbh

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:17 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm not even in the game and i have no idea who eski is so wg is also being hyperdefensive of anyone being defensive

everyone here is making mountains out of molehills

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:41 pm (UTC)(link)
this. wgers are super cagey about the bullshit they trot out here as wank because there is nothing left

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:21 pm (UTC)(link)
always wondered what it would look like if someone was a celebrity stalker over a nobody

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:29 pm (UTC)(link)
not for nothing anon but this whole thread started when it was pretty late where eski lives. since the post went up, she only linked it once on discord and her plurk. i don't think she's stupid enough to link her own post on wankgate either.

i think she made her post and some jigoku whiteknight linked it to defend the game's honor. instead they ended up dragging an unrelated player on wg and summoning a bunch of whiteknights that made her and the game look bad.

+1

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:39 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm pretty sure this is the same jigokucho whiteknight who has been jumping down people's throats for bringing up issues with the game. "maybe you should be asking different questions?" is the same condescending tone they used to call people out for not reading.

good job giving wg a different name to latch onto though. you're so bad at whiteknighting your own game.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:47 pm (UTC)(link)
And this is why the whiteknights need to stop.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:36 pm (UTC)(link)
please remember that "hi x" on wankgate is wrong 99% of the time and you are not the exception

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:45 pm (UTC)(link)
at this point it doesn't matter if eski was involved or not, the game (and by extension the player) looks bad because a few anons decided that frothing at the mouth over a nonissue was a good idea. i guarantee you nobody would've cared otherwise if they laid off and left it alone.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 03:13 pm (UTC)(link)
youre the froth

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 04:54 pm (UTC)(link)
here's the thing

if anons are not in the game then they don't care if the game looks bad. idk when you guys are gonna figure this out

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 06:03 pm (UTC)(link)
if someone decides how a game "looks" based on random comments on wankgate, i wouldn't want them on my game anyway

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 18:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 19:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 19:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 19:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 20:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 23:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 23:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 23:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 23:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 23:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 02:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 02:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 02:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 08:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 12:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 13:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 13:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 13:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 15:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 15:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 22:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 22:37 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 22:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 23:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 23:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 23:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 23:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 02:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 02:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 03:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 03:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 03:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 04:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 13:21 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 13:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 14:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 14:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 15:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 15:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 13:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 04:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 04:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 11:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 04:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 04:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-09 04:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 01:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 01:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-08 00:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 23:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 20:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 19:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:52 pm (UTC)(link)
which really weren't all that offensive to begin with, just dumb, but you had people screeching OMG WTF HOLY SHIT YOU'RE SO INSANE

This. I admittedly rolled my eyes a little at the comment but acting like this person was RP Hitler for suggesting that maybe a player should've given the mods a heads up is kind of ridiculous. I don't think it would've blown up like it did if the tone wasn't disproportionately incendiary.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 03:42 pm (UTC)(link)
"screeching OMG WTF HOLY SHIT YOU'RE SO INSANE"

is this a disproportionately incendiary tone

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 03:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Reactions like "are you genuinely insane" and "what the fuck" are a little extreme for what was actually posted, yes. I'd also concur that "it was a good post by a good player and you should feel bad for saying it was bad" was not a point that needed to be made over and over again.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 16:29 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 16:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 08:01 pm (UTC)(link)
eski is also just annoying as fuck tho it doesn't help her case