Ryan Gosling (
ryanongosling) wrote in
wankgate2022-02-14 02:55 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
239: how does one become popular on dreamwidth rp?

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.
Keep the rules in mind.
LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE
Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report stupid shit here.
Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 09:09 pm (UTC)(link)Is this person one of the mods or something? Is it a rando player trying to mod from the backseat? I don't play in this game and I'm confused about what is happening here.
Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 09:14 pm (UTC)(link)i don't think it's modding from the backseat, it's a handy reference to see which info is known to whom because a lot of people ask questions and not everyone may have been going thru the post looking at questions.
but this is a good faith take on this situation so nobody probably cares.
Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)i don't doubt the player was trying to be helpful, but doing an extended write-up like this sets a bad precedent and makes it seems like this person is a mod liason and that they can be approached in a mod capacity and asked mod questions when they are not actually a mod
at the very least, they probably should've asked permission first, as this is something the mod team should've been looped into beforehand and not after so they didn't wind up disseminating incorrect information, misrepresenting mod stances, looking like a mod favorite, etc.
put in that context, "you beat us to it!" was likely their gentle way of saying "please don't do this on your own again"
tl;dr good intention, bad execution, not the best look for this player because i can see how it reads like backseat modding
Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)i HIGHLY doubt the mods were actually going to do the same to compile all this information. it took people calling them out on an anon comm to put up a locations post, to add more substance to their ic events, and then they had to be asked by multiple people (after already saying no) to put up an ooc plotting post for the new event.
i think this looks bad on the mods more than anything. that they aren't very proactive on their own plus the fact that they've scattered so much information everywhere, led to a player taking matters into their own hands.
Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 01:37 am (UTC)(link)Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)If you're used to big games where the mods structure everything, that's fine. But it's not the only way to do things and it doesn't mean the player has done something untoward.
Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 02:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 04:08 (UTC) - ExpandRe: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 05:14 (UTC) - ExpandRe: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 05:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 05:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 06:50 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) - 2022-04-06 23:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2022-04-07 00:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 12:11 am (UTC)(link)tbh i'm not even in the game and i appreciate this player and don't think less of the mods. if i was a mod i would just take it to heart 1) players are excited and engaged enough in what i'm doing to put the time and energy into this and 2) going forward, i should do the same and compile info posts, since everyone seemed to like and appreciate it
like, this is a good thing on display and isn't anything worth complaining about (at this stage)
Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 12:13 am (UTC)(link)didn't Deerington have an entire PDF document created by the players to figure things out? I know I've seen "smart" characters compile things like this ICly as well to hand to newbie characters as a sort of catch up on current events
+1
(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 12:55 am (UTC)(link)Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 12:59 am (UTC)(link)it's kinda sad that ppl squint at something as innocuous as a plotting post on the ooc com because it "makes them look like a mod liaison" lmao. maybe i'm old, but we used to do this shit all the time back in the day.
Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:13 am (UTC)(link)This is why no one wants to do anything in games and this is why nothing gets done in games without mods spoon feeding everyone plot like babies.
Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 01:39 am (UTC)(link)Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)i expected some huge write-up, not two short lists and a few sentences. if people were struggling to find that in a dedicated q&a post so badly that they felt the need to compile it instead of waiting for the mods to deliver an official summary then the players just sound dense af
Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 01:02 am (UTC)(link)Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 01:42 am (UTC)(link)there's definitely a timing factor to consider, like when is too soon (or too late) to do a post like this, and that's really hard to figure, but it feels like pure wankgate brainworms to see all of this and read it as wank (if not outright headcanoning) on the part of the player OR the mods.
the player didn't do anything wrong. neither did the mods. neither of them seem bothered by what the other is doing. people are making up scenarios in their heads where this is somehow drama.
Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:54 am (UTC)(link)/thread, right here.