Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 06:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Somewhere between a peeve and more Jigokucho posting but I am actually so pressed about all the people on my timeline going on about how entitled and whiny dwrpers are to mods.

No. Fuck off with this historical revisionism. dwrpers suck but these mods are jerks and made bad decisions that they didn't have to.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 06:40 pm (UTC)(link)
my timeline is mostly comprised of ex players who are justifiably upset that they were mistreated and lied to so it's not all bad. i'm sorry about your shitty timeline missing the point

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 06:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 06:41 pm (UTC)(link)
drop names lol

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)
It's not worth pastebinning it's just generic "we need to be nicer to each other/mods get treated like paid customer service" platitudes and talking points (is there a name for this sort of maneuver, where someone drops a borderline non sequitur in order to look like the reasonable side in an argument)

(Anonymous) 2022-10-02 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
never understood this. modding IS customer service but volunteer. people should be polite, but mods also do have a duty to do the job they volunteered for. i honestly have more sympathy for a paid customer service worker being bad at their job than mods because a mod can choose to leave at any time if they don't want to do it anymore, there's no economical pressure forcing them to do something they hate or are shit at.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 00:33 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 00:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 00:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 00:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 00:38 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 00:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 00:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 00:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 00:55 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 00:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 05:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 01:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 00:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 00:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 00:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 08:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-06 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
the ben shapiro style of thought-terminating cliches, maybe?

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-06 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
probably counts as a middle ground fallacy in this case. sometimes strawman, though.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 06:42 pm (UTC)(link)
who in the world could possibly see what is happening and have any sympathy for the mods???

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 06:58 pm (UTC)(link)
nayrt pretty sure its almost all gsai/xander/bee's friends saying that shit rn

i've seen a couple people who are way too new to the game to know what's been going on tossing in their two cents too, but that's just giving the benefit of the doubt out of ignorance

+1

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-01 19:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 07:27 pm (UTC)(link)
It's less sympathy or caring about the mod's feelings and more frustration at someone shitting in their pool. I can understand that, it sucks to suffer repercussions due to no action of your own. But it's naive to think it's not the mods who shat in the pool.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 07:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Reminds me of the upcycle people who stayed ride or die during the drama

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 07:46 pm (UTC)(link)
to play the devil's advocate, it's precisely because dwrp chased off all the good sane mods that this is all that's left lol. quix and gonsai within a month of each other, you can't make this shit up

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 07:52 pm (UTC)(link)
gonsai and his clique were cited as the main reason of burn-out by mods of two different games I know so yeah

+1

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-01 20:09 (UTC) - Expand

+2

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-01 23:41 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-02 00:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 08:02 pm (UTC)(link)
that's obviously wrong in the case of these mods but the only thing i've seen on my plurk is someone telling mods that they ought to behave like customer service employees and take the "customer is always right" mentality when modding a game

and they're not even really saying that's a good thing, just that it's the way it is, and christ it's no wonder no one wants to mod anymore except power-tripping jerks like gsai and quix.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 08:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm pretty sure we're talking about the same plurk and it still rubbed me the wrong way because that's still implying that it's the playerbase's fault for complaining so much and not, having reasons to complain

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)
the same plurk is on my tl and while I disagree that that's how mods should behave, I can see how op got there. like, they're recommending just rolling over and caving to everything because they got sent fucking suibait when they didn't

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)
tbf if you're not in the game, new to the game/weren't very involved, don't read anon comms and only saw the ooc post, it'd be pretty easy to interpret it as a modteam being brutally dogpiled because a bunch of players are uncomfortable when not about me

wrong, but very possible

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 08:49 am (UTC)(link)
here's a wild take

jerkass mods and entitled players can both exist in the same game and contribute to wanksplosions together

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 12:44 pm (UTC)(link)
how dare you

one side is always the unambiguous good guys who never do anything bad and its whatever side im on

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 12:55 pm (UTC)(link)
feel free to expand upon how jgk players were being entitled, i'm sure that will end well

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 12:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 13:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 16:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 16:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 16:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 16:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 17:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 17:52 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 17:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 18:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 18:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 18:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 18:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 18:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 18:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 13:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 13:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 14:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 15:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 15:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 16:14 (UTC) - Expand

OP

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 17:10 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 17:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 20:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 21:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 22:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2022-10-05 23:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 07:22 pm (UTC)(link)
What does "historical revisionism" mean, anon

There isn't much correlation between "players have been shitty and whiny to mods in the past" vs "these mods in particular suck shit"

These mods do suck shit, but how does the JGK mods being awful mean there's never been a case of players harassing mods before? Or did we just decide to accept anon mods because it seemed cool?

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 07:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Tune in for another exciting episode of "Troll or Can't Fucking Read"!!

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 07:50 pm (UTC)(link)
there's a deep irony to this because whenever i talk about entitled players treating mods like shit and expecting them to bow to their every whim, i am always specifically thinking of gsai and pals, who were in my modding experience the worst group of whiny pissbabies operating under the delusion that they were paying customers who spoke for the entire playerbase and ergo the mods had a responsibility to cater to them specifically because it was their job.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)
people saying 'we should be nicer to mods :c' in the middle of the jigo implosion were not saying that in good faith, only saying that because they were upset their current game was going under and wanted to pass the buck to anyone other than the mods

suggesting anything about the jigo situation was the fault of anyone other than the mods and their close friends is revisionism