ryanongosling: (Default)
Ryan Gosling ([personal profile] ryanongosling) wrote in [community profile] wankgate2024-05-21 06:04 pm

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 06:31 am (UTC)(link)
why exactly is the tdm open to the public, when reserves and apps are only open to those who've friended the mod?

do people get invites if they play on the tdm and everyone likes them? is the tdm like game tryouts to see who gets judged as worthy to join? i'm confused

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 07:09 am (UTC)(link)
no and no. it's only open to people on the mod's plurk list period. i don't get why the tdm is public either and the mod is even encouraging anyone to post.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 09:19 am (UTC)(link)
attention

it's not a big mystery idk why anons are acting dumb

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 09:57 am (UTC)(link)
I had someone in Flist admitting they were using AI to reply to my stuff.

My character's gender kept switching to 'She' (because het is the norm? IDK), skin color was never consistent and the thread was going all over the place without much regard to what I wrote.

AI rp may exist but it sucks so bad people WILL notice if you're using character.ai to write your replies, anon. Go do your tags.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 10:03 am (UTC)(link)
for fun? i see plenty of people on there who know they can't app but they enjoy the setting.

the tdm also has to be open to the public to allow non-member journals to post on it. it's normal for even private games to use a mod plurk to link to new posts. it's not the mod's fault that players decide to replurk it.

i get the frustration but these are all normal things to happen in dwrp

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 10:05 am (UTC)(link)
it's probably some no name person that op has a hateboner for

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 10:06 am (UTC)(link)
i see that happen and people still complain about it even though players have the right to be able to make commentary plurks if they want. dwrp has a huge issue with jealousy and players feeling entitled imho. like some people seem to genuinely think if you're having fun in a game they can't join you shouldn't be allowed to talk about it on your own plurk.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 10:09 am (UTC)(link)
> milk reappears on plurk
> saltburn wank reappears on wankgate

hmm wonder if these two events are connected in some way

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 10:33 am (UTC)(link)
your layout is ugly and it's also stupid to replurk private games to people who can't join

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 10:53 am (UTC)(link)
bored of plurking to the three friends you have left after you alienated everyone else, milk?

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 11:00 am (UTC)(link)
your layout is still ugly, bad layout designer

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 11:44 am (UTC)(link)
Shh stop being reasonable

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 11:49 am (UTC)(link)
i think that's a different thing tho. people making commentary plurks because they have other people from their game in their plurks is understandable.

mods making public plurks for their private games (and sometimes even asking dwrp to replurk) despite not opening invites outside mod friends is weird.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 12:19 pm (UTC)(link)
you don't get it anon. people complain.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 12:32 pm (UTC)(link)
if only there were some way to block or mute the mod plurk accounts to stop them showing up on your feed

-1

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 01:21 pm (UTC)(link)
this isn't the fucking sicilian mafia. you're not going to wake up with a horse head on your pillow if you report them. put on your big girl pants and speak up.

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 01:35 pm (UTC)(link)
+1 if this person has so many victims i’m not sure why you can’t say who they are here

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 01:38 pm (UTC)(link)
This is so boring and tired

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 02:01 pm (UTC)(link)
very much like that early to mid 2000s aesthetic of yours, bad layout designer

i know you must be bad layout designer because no one else could possibly care, yes?

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)
the way people are acting terrified to even namedrop them anonymously here just makes it look like someone running an advance defensive lmao

are they wg mods or something. do they have your ip

what an enemy to make

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 02:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, among others.

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 02:18 pm (UTC)(link)
probably the gnosia player

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 02:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Whatever. I don't have a horse in this race besides thinking she's an asshole. But I've heard the stories of her doing this to enough different people that I know OP is telling the truth, so I'll do it.

It's Alisa/symbological on plurk. The details are all in private discord chats so they'll never come out publicly until one of her friends turns on her, as is usually the case around here.

If you're in the game then you know why it's a bad idea to go to those mods about her. OP, I'm sorry to say but you might just have to drop. I've never once seen a modteam do the right thing when one of their friends is a wanker.

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 02:42 pm (UTC)(link)
this is all really disheartening to read about

if you genuinely can't trust the mods not to protect a friend as nasty as this from consequences, to the point of closing their eyes to harassment, to me that's definitely cause to drop.

but if you want a slightly more optimistic approach, i would see about arranging for multiple reports from a mix of sources, ideally none of whom are yourself directly. safety in numbers, plus harder to ignore multiple concerned parties.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-07-11 02:42 pm (UTC)(link)
the context there is that anon kicked off the conversion by insulting the aerith player, so i can see why anons would jump to that conclusion