wankgate | 251: back in my day wank meant something

251: back in my day wank meant something

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

wait if the persona kid is like under 18 wouldn't the missionary bit be pushing it unless it's another teen?

yeah there needs to be more clarification in the player's part

it means sexual skills should be appropriate to the character's age

your barely-18 yaoi boy has to fumble constantly and cum in 5 seconds

your barely-18 definitely not a loli girl should give the most awkward toothy blowjobs and gag on 2" of cock

don't even joke about this, I've met people who would unironically think it sounds like a good idea

what is with these assumptions that op is saying you shouldn't ship at all lmfao

are you new here? wg never reads anything in good faith

soak the tip a bit only

So, a good Lestat, then?

please make your dream asexy game so we can all point and laugh at it

i got namedropped years and years ago for rping stuff in public that i probably shouldve taken behind closed doors. fair cop tbh, so i knocked it off and nobody's ever said anything since.

hi ashley

Yes

this is why this amazing thing called google exists

My rule in the invite games I've modded is shipping is fine but smut threads have to be taken off comm and don't count toward AC.

They could still write all the smut they wanted but if people wanted to make AC they also needed to do some threads that built general CR or engaged with plots.

The logistics were easy. Threads could be used for AC up to the smut cut off, because policing shipping is more nebulous and I don't want to do it. So people wrote smut off-comm. They also threaded general CR and plot threads. The games I ran did not burn down and ran decent lengths of time.

You're way overcomplicating it and also assuming everyone in dwrp is in it for the same thing. Plenty of people are genuinely invested in non-smut aspects of RP like the relationship parts of shipping, plots, and gen CR. Plenty of games survive without a smut focus.

There's no need to get defensive about how it's impossible. Games not catering to you aren't implicitly judging you by doing so.

Firefox accidnetally cut a line from the top of my post: "I do think shipping is too hard to limit but games can avoid focusing on smut"

That's one area I don't agree with the poster above about. Shipping's too hard to regulate and is part of the same relationship spectrum as anything else.

not bothering to google your character if you can't even bother to write real preferences

+1

never gonna happen

They could still write all the smut they wanted but if people wanted to make AC they also needed to do some threads that built general CR

... smut threads can build/deepen cr, though? like this is honestly a weird take. if a thread is 80 comments building up to smut and then 15 comments of actual smut, why shouldn't those 15 comments also be allowed to count for ac? why should they be disqualified just because they include the actual act?

you don't have to plurk everyday to say you aren't going to be able to tag. you never tag. you made ac last month with tags all written in the last 4 days. hope mods are watching.

Well, they said general cr. As in cr without sex. Personally I always disqualified smut as ac in games I ran since they weren't sex games and I didn't want to have to check smut over and I felt like that was fair enough.

This is why I eventually removed rubi's chinese wizard jgy player from my plurklist and stopped trying to seek out cr with them

I absolutely think smut rp can deepen CR. I play it all the time in psls, memes, off to the side of my games, and have played it in games in the past. But I've been on a gen and plot kick for a while. If I plan to put a ton of work into plots and also want to play out and foster something more gen rp focused, the only way to really ensure people won't be using the game as window dressing for their smut rp is to ban smut rp in game, especially since it doesn't stop anyone from enjoying it off the comm, myself included.

Banning it waves a big unwelcome sign to people who are exclusively interested in smut and nothing else. It affects who self-selects in and self-selects out. Most people only interested in smut and nothing else aren't going to app into a game where smut can only be done off to the side. Just like people that aren't currently interested in smut aren't going to app into a game that has a smut AC, which is the exact inverse of a smut ban.

man this is so many people all the time for me i wouldn't have been able to single anyone out

you are not missing out

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

Page 232 of 308

251: back in my day wank meant something

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: namedroppees of wg

Re: namedroppees of wg

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

sa

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

^ayrt

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES