wankgate | 251: back in my day wank meant something

251: back in my day wank meant something

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

you don't have to plurk everyday to say you aren't going to be able to tag. you never tag. you made ac last month with tags all written in the last 4 days. hope mods are watching.

This is why I eventually removed rubi's chinese wizard jgy player from my plurklist and stopped trying to seek out cr with them

man this is so many people all the time for me i wouldn't have been able to single anyone out

you are not missing out

Did they used to be JGY in Deer Country? They were a huge flake then too.

i hope this is pronounced juggy

I am 99 percent sure it is the same

would you rather people just not communicate when they're unable to do tags and silently ghost you so you can complain about that instead

i don't think you believe me when i say everyday but what i mean is that it's every single day

two months ago they passed ac with a 3 comment thread and a 1 comment thread. last month they made ac with 5 comment network thread they started on july 25 and a 2 comment log they started on july 29

then it sounds like the mods are allowing it as acceptable activity

case closed, touch grass

mute their plurk then, damn

is your finger too broken to use the mute or unfollow buttons, anon? i assume not because you found your way here.

i fucking hate it when someone says something like 'just mute/unfollow,' 'don't like don't read,' etc

ignoring something doesn't make it go away

amazingly, you can decide that something is not your problem, like the barbie-smashing of a person you don't tag.

wow, that's brilliant! i should just stop caring about my problems, then i won't have any! why didn't i think of that?

why is this person's lousy activity your problem?

i want my buttbuddy to play that character instead, duh. also that bitch ate all my crackers.

that's what psls are for

also crackers suck

spoiler: it doesn't have to go away. someone opposed to your viewpoint has every right to spew it as you do yours. mute/ignore is literally the best option and is the ones that puts the onus on you, the offended party, to curate your world experience. being offended is not an actual offense, ffs. you're not traumatized by it. you can't sue for being offended at someone's opinion.

the main issue is that some people, clearly like you, who can't separate 'people not liking things i like' with 'people not liking me'. someone not liking a thing you like is not a personal attack on you. you make it personal. especially when your response is 'it needs to go away'. no, it doesn't. you need to ignore it. your opinion is not the only one that matters. it only matters to you.

but throwing an anonymous shitfit on wankgate does make it go away, I see

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

251: back in my day wank meant something

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

op

Re: op

Re: op

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject