wankgate | 251: back in my day wank meant something

251: back in my day wank meant something

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

everytime you complain on wg another meme shitposter gets their redwings.

shitposting is ironic

shit posting is what's happening on bakerstreet

it's actually funny that all the spam is pushing torines precious food meme off the page

We spam memes for days
Every niche you want
They're falling off the page

if you don't see how this is shitposting, idk what to tell you

i'll never forget u tuscan whole milk....

i missed the joke the first time too

And that Bioshock game, looks like they deleted it

https://nuu.dreamwidth.org/
https://nuumod.dreamwidth.org/
https://nuuooc.dreamwidth.org/

why would they be? its not their fault people assumed shit

They talked about doing a sci-fi lab game and Deerington prequel in the same plurk about dark academia bojack horseman so those might be next

what

there are so many hi x's, and i think it is best assumed the majority of them are incorrect. i all of them, because word choice and tone indicators and typing style don't really identify a person, but then i would be including gsai. so only most of them.

well i accidentally a couple of words and they were "would say"

no? it’s not my fault people are stupid.

i was gonna say 1, but this is a really good point. i don't app to games with anon mods and this is at least half of why. anyone can complain about anything, but it would be weird to refuse to accept equally private players. dwrp is unusual in that people connecting all their characters and using a central player name is the norm.

my assumption is that 10% of hi x is shitposting and 90% of hi x is shitposting trying to get whoever you named negative attention especially if they're a relative nobody.

it's shit, and it's posting

someone who posts

>> I do not often discourse on here but if it's your inclination to preach about voting for Biden the butcher and the Democratic cabal of simpering genocide-enabling shitheads then we should reconsider our acquaintance. If this is the height of your ability to politically activate, by definition preaching to the choir, then get gone. I won't remember you

Telling a niche hobby of mostly queers that they better get up and vote lol what is your disease

That man and his party have beheaded children, and even if they didn't they owe you $800! You wanna sit here and type about how people should get up and vote? Go knock on a fucking door if you believe in your little party so much. Log off <<

makes me wonder just who you think has your little queer best interests in mind because it isn't anyone NOT democratic, especially since you a poc in atlanta. the fuck. and the four people who liked your plurk make me side eye, too. yall the reason that orange jabba got elected the first time.

this is wankgate, assume malice. "hi x" is a logical fallacy designed to insinuate that the only person who could possibly oppose a statement is the target of that statement.

even this is not always a reliable indicator tho. gonsai once wanted to use a well known rage of bahamut/granblue fantasy character as a character's pb. maybe because in his head he felt any non-genshin non-fgo mobile game character wouldn't be recognisable by dwrpers.

but agreed that bad vibes aren't enough to identify a wanker.

Depends on what it is that's giving me bad vibes about their questions.

If it's just "something about the way they write reminds me indefinably of person X!" then I would go with option 1. Let them in, don't bring it up, keep an eye on them.

If it's "they're being weirdly hostile, nitpicky, etc" then I would bring that up with the rest of the modteam as the actual issue. If they're giving me problem player vibes separate from my suspicions that they're a secret wanker, and they're not even in the game yet, they're probably going to be a nightmare if we accept them regardless of who they secretly are.

please namedrop so i can block this person

Someone who you banned from a different game 8 years ago apps to a new game you're modding.

They were banned for unreasonable OOC behavior, screaming at people on Plurk, etc., and they made multiple furious plurks after you banned them about how much your game sucks and how unfair the ban was.

However, when you check their social media now, there's none of the unreasonable vitriol that got them banned back in the day. They seem vastly more chill and like a non-problem player.

Do you pre-ban them from your game? Contact them privately to discuss it? Let them in and wait to see? Why?

if the mod (you) was an anon mod in the previous game, or anon modding the new game: pm the player and say "thanks for the interest, we will not be accepting your app due to precedent of behavior in a past game." this protects you, personally, from the same sort of tirade and you have receipts of them causing problems.

also, a reasonable player that has chilled out as they seem would accept the rejection without throwing a fit. if they app again in the future, you still have room to accept as long as it was not a clear cut ban. if they show signs of not having changed, then a ban is all the more warranted.

if the player knows you were the reason for their previous ban, or is likely to recognize you as a non-anon mod for the new game, do not contact them privately. There's the chance they'd make things difficult for you by vaguing about you on wankgate or to new plurk friends who did not witness their previous problem behavior.

seconding this lol

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

Page 33 of 308

251: back in my day wank meant something

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

Re: NEWCOMB

Re: YOU BE THE MOD

Re: NEWCOMB

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: ayrt

sa

Re: YOU BE THE MOD

Re: YOU BE THE MOD

Re: ayrt

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

Re: ayrt

Re: YOU BE THE MOD

Re: YOU BE THE MOD

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

Re: YOU BE THE MOD

Re: YOU BE THE MOD

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES