wankgate | 251: back in my day wank meant something

251: back in my day wank meant something

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

yeah the amount of times i have seen people claim someone is for sure the one doing x on wankgate is also pretty large. i was in a game once where people thought i was bitching about a plot for some reason even though i liked the plot and never really complained about anything.

i come here to read gossip and that's about it. occasionally i comment to threads like this. but someone was very sure i was the one throwing a fit about the plot because...tone indicators.

i pretty much always assume no one can actually tell who someone is anon because of stuff like that.

there are so many hi x's, and i think it is best assumed the majority of them are incorrect. i all of them, because word choice and tone indicators and typing style don't really identify a person, but then i would be including gsai. so only most of them.

well i accidentally a couple of words and they were "would say"

my assumption is that 10% of hi x is shitposting and 90% of hi x is shitposting trying to get whoever you named negative attention especially if they're a relative nobody.

this is wankgate, assume malice. "hi x" is a logical fallacy designed to insinuate that the only person who could possibly oppose a statement is the target of that statement.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

251: back in my day wank meant something

ayrt

Re: ayrt

sa

Re: ayrt

Re: ayrt