wankgate | 251: back in my day wank meant something

251: back in my day wank meant something

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

+1

it's one thing if this is a character from some obscure visual novel that no one else would be interested in playing, but if we're talking a popular character from a popular canon then people need to use a little judgment and realize that other people are probably going to want the chance to play them in a game too and that it's not fair to app that specific character to every single game.

Agreed. It's one thing if it's a rare canon, a show that hasn't aired in ten years, or even a canon that was but now isn't popular in dwrp anymore, but if it's something big then read the damn room

exactly. if it's something rare or weird that no one else plays from, go ahead and app to as many games as you want.

the problem isn't the number of games you're playing in, it's that you're taking that spot away from someone else who would like to have a fair chance to be able to play that character. that only becomes a problem when there are a lot of other people who also want to play that character.

Yeah, play your oc or a rarer character in ten games, who gives a shit, but don't be apping an MCU hot boy to ten

which MCU hot boys are still hot these days?

it used to be Loki and Tony Stark? even if the latter hasn't been relevant in several years.. Bucky maybe?

I wouldn't mind seeing MCU hot boys if we got more variety tbh

I've seen a lot of Stephen Strange thirst around. Probably a daddy kink thing tbqh.

Also Peter Parker, for the twink kink

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

251: back in my day wank meant something

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: GAME PET PEEVES