Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-05-28 08:54 am (UTC)(link)
can we please focus on the issue that actually matters here

now we can't slip into the game and leak things to chortle fatly over here

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-05-28 11:14 am (UTC)(link)
i do genuinely wonder if this decision was partly because of that one anon who bragged about doing this on here

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-05-28 11:16 am (UTC)(link)
well it's all you guys' faults for having more than 7k comments last thread

i mean i can't make a boast like that and not follow through, next time have maybe half the e-beggar wank and we'll be lucky to break 5k

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-05-28 11:17 am (UTC)(link)
dwbi i'll toss you an invite

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-05-28 11:28 am (UTC)(link)
sure bb

hit me up at [personal profile] onlyg

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-05-28 11:57 am (UTC)(link)
ngl a cynical part of me immediately thought they're just sick of the anon commentary lately and want to choke it since invite-only games can't be discussed in anon comms.

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-05-28 12:03 pm (UTC)(link)
slight correction

they CAN be, we just can't fish for wank about them

if we've got solid deets that shit's going down in there (without breaking dreamwidth's TOS by leaking the contents of a locked entry), we can post it