wankgate | 251: back in my day wank meant something

251: back in my day wank meant something

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

so there is no ic basis. thanks for confirming

my original point was people tag them because they actually tag back. sorry people don't want to invite you i guess?

i'm actually already in the game, i just want character concepts made for bakerstreet/tlh to stay there

it's a good thing no one is forcing you to tag them then

dude you're playing in a sex game

fwiw i agree with you but people are going to argue this issue anyway. to me, there's a line between rping a character in a sex game in an IC, believable way... and rping against what is clearly a manifestation of someone's OOC fetish.

it's not a clear line, hence why people will argue it. but in the case of this soundwave i just don't want to engage with what, to me, looks less like an IC character choice and more like an OOC fetish.

i'd honestly be surprised if they got into the game myself, but we'll see.

does that mean you don't rp with m/m only players because it's a manifestation of someone's OOC fetish

nice bait

it's just funny how these people love insisting "oh i would NEVER play with someone because it's so NASTY and GROSS since they're obviously projecting their OOC kinks" but then suddenly they have no problem with it when it's catering to their fetish

ok but that isn’t what is happening here

oh? word? what's happening here?

queer people existing aren't a fetish you fucking dipshit

you could argue that playing a character who clearly likes women and shows no interest in men as a cockhop is for fetish reasons

otoh there are so few women in the game that you could never actually win game 52 as a m/f only male character, and you probably never will be able to no many how many women app next round

now this comment definitely reads like someone who only plays smut for the fetish

turn on your monitor

it's wild to me that people still pretend we aren't writing porn for ourselves here

even the stuff that isn't sex is just other types of porn for our own gratification.

do you think your thread of a genshin getting buttpregnant from a superwholock is serious art or something

my condolences to your thread partners

i was gonna say, ppl in here are acting like an invite's guaranteed them a spot in the game already but don't prospective characters still need to like. actually app to get in

an app for a game where the last big drama was about just how picky the mods were about the app standards, no less

panic properly when the character actually gets in lol

listen, no matter what the gp mods do, people are going to bitch and moan about it. idk man, i'm just here, popcorning at people disaster posting about it.

minimally related, but i appreciate the mods putting a link to the invitation page right at the top of the applications page though. 10/10 readability, i love this for you all and wish you the best going forward.

if you don't want to play with concepts created for tlh i have bad news about your magic jamjar sex hotel

These types of replies give me a chuckle because the app page literally said "we're not trying to be the game version of bakerstreet smut memes or the love hotel" when it first opened.

that does make it extra funny that "game tlh" is now how they're being perceived

Eh it's not "game tlh" until xc and mcp get invites but since most of their characters are under the minimum age limit for the game I don't see that happening

Actually I think XC has either been asked to not app or he lost interest in the game after not getting in the first round.

I think he was in the sinfluencers plurk so he's found a new game to not get into.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

251: back in my day wank meant something

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK