Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-09 07:11 pm (UTC)(link)
They insisted I put new name/deadname everywhere, including in the chat display name. Apps, taken pages, meme posts, everything.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-09 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)
do you have receipts of this?

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-10 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)
So no receipts huh?

You really need to stop burning bridges and lying on people for attention. So much of dw was on your side with all the shit jess pulled, and this is what you continue to do.

To accuse a mod team full of gnc people of something this heinous with no proof is really shitty.

This didn't work out the way you wanted it to did it?

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-11 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)
we don't know it's really mandy and not just someone so hungry for wank they're making shit up. for all we know this could be jess.

+1

(Anonymous) 2024-06-11 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
just as we shouldn't consider an anonymous comment enough to be a point against the lab mods without proof, we shouldn't do the same with anyone else either

+1

(Anonymous) 2024-06-11 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
"but its okay if i lie to manufacture wank because im bored" bitches get a life immediately challenge

+1

(Anonymous) 2024-06-12 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
mandy might change her handle every time something goes wrong, but calling her alts deadnames doesn't sound like her, especially since she still uses she/her. there can be more than one person prone to complaining without evidence

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2024-06-12 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)
she has called her previous names deadnames recently but i've never seen her claim to be trans anywhere

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2024-06-12 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
if she's not trans that's an unusually high level of tonedeaf even for here

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2024-06-13 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
especially when most of us have probably changed our handles at least once for perfectly innocuous reasons

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-12 03:23 am (UTC)(link)
+1 anons regularly admit to stirring shit here just because they're bored, so i'd take this with a heavy grain of salt