wankgate | 251: back in my day wank meant something

251: back in my day wank meant something

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

i'm ngl i get where you're coming from but letting anon dictate your preferences is some next level brainrot

it would be so easy for that to have just been someone lying and shit stirring

eh

if it were a whole canon i'd agree, but frankly i don't think i'm losing anything of value by not rping with a bunch of characters who are, at best, donut steel very special blorbos, and at worst self-inserts

plus the fact that they immediately turned around and got mad about the insinuation that they don't get smut threads definitely reinforces that they play a malleable protag, though as someone else said they could be a wol player throwing tavs in front of the train

imo it's not about the blorbos it's about you looking like a moron who believes wankgate

this happened on rpa

and again, if you can tell me what i'm missing by not tagging malleable protags...but you can't, because i'm missing nothing

it's like saying "no fandom ocs"

no i genuinely do not care about some ugly western game not tagging you, i'm just offering some good faith advice that it's a bad look to appear to take cues from anon shit. but i guess good faith tips on wg are pointless lol

i mean there have been journals from games with malleable protags for a long time that say they're not interested in those ships, this is not a new thing

and anyway it's still advocating for people to be untruthful about what they don't want to tag, which ultimately just leads to people wasting their time with tag-ins that were always going to be ignored

as always in dwrp, the best choice is to communicate with other rpers as little as humanly possible.

communication is rude and might hurt people's feelings

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

251: back in my day wank meant something

Re: da

Re: da

Re: da

Re: da

Re: da

Re: da

Re: da

Re: da