251: back in my day wank meant something

[ryanongosling]

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.

Keep the rules in mind.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves

Report stupid shit here.

Comments

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

no one said that lol

i promise i don't want to tag you

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

you definitely don't! it'd get dropped too fast. speaking of which, the reason most of your threads don't last very long is because your oc is a kind of teenager's-first-oc mix of edgy and perfect, with all the hallmarks of someone who's too invested in their blorbo, combined with the fact that your writing is extremely purple. her personality is also, from what i've seen, too easily adapted to fit every thread/ship you personally want, and the inconsistency won't convince anyone looking in from the outside that you're playing a character as opposed to a version of yourself who can hit on your faves.

hope these tips are helpful.

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

you don't want me to know exactly who you are lol

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

would you ask your personal friend denise to ban me

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

i like this because you don't know who i am but i will recognize you and know not to tag you. for having bad takes, and a very cringe personality

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

i guarantee you have no idea who i am, but it's very funny to imagine you avoiding some rando in your fandom because you're absolutely sure they're on wankgate

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

i already said how i'm going to recognize not to tag you, unless you really are too chicken to write your preferences now. looks like you want to tag me so bad it makes you stupid lol

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

oh wait

do you think there's only one person on this entire site whose permissions say no malleable protags? do you just not look at permissions posts?

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

so the heinous malleable protag is played by denise's very close personal friend whom she personally whiteknights for on wg, kit?

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

oh my

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

i can't tell what's a joke anymore

i need everyone to use shifty eyes if they're being ironic please

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

if it helps, it's referencing when folkmore mod kit was namedropped and totally-not-kit commented implying kit is close bosom buddies with denise (who also monitors wg 24/7 in case she needs to defend her bestest friend kit) in what i can only assume was a cringe scare tactic.

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

i knew that part, i just couldn't tell if the person namedropping kit was joking or actually namedropping kit

now that i wrote it out it's obviously a joke and i'll report to the chicken immediately

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

no the entire thing was sarcasm, kit has said she's on good terms with denise about stuff like asking about downtime. she never actually said it in relation to wg, anons just picked that up and ran with it OR someone was being conspiracy theory paranoid that shit talking denise's former ship partner would get them in trouble

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

it's wankgate, assume everyone is being ironically stupid until you receive indications otherwise

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

I want to know who you’re talking about now

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

is this a compilation of every common wg complaint made into a single rp journal because it is definitely hitting those notes, well done

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

no, but i understand why you'd think that because the journal in question fell down a mountain of cliches and hit every rock on the way

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

so you really did throw a rando under the bus like you said you weren't going to

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

you're thinking of either some other anon or a different thread because i have no idea what you're talking about

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

so who's this about, spill the deets

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

if you don't interact with malleable protags or fandom ocs you won't run into them, and even if you do you'd have to be willing to deal with overwhelmingly pretentious tumblresque writing

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

I do fuck with those though

which is why I asked you to spill

Re: da

[(Anonymous)]

if it doesn't sound familiar you're in the clear. you might be in the clear anyway since these are anonymous comments and nobody is a mind reader no matter how smug some anons are being. there's a high chance that naming who some anons think it is would be wrong and be tar and feathering someone whose only crime is having flowery writing for their oc.

dda

[(Anonymous)]

with what some wg anons think is ~too much~ I wouldn't be surprised if they thought the "purple prose" was just a tag more than a sentence long with an adjective in there somewhere.