Ryan Gosling (
ryanongosling) wrote in
wankgate2024-05-21 06:04 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
251: back in my day wank meant something

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.
Keep the rules in mind.
LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE
Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report stupid shit here.
Re: UNPOPULAR DWRP OPINIONS
(Anonymous) 2024-06-19 12:23 pm (UTC)(link)I feel like if secondhand did what she did today, the mods would freeze and delete the wank. Don't you notice? I know you don't care. Perhaps you'd even bitch at the mods to delete it because it was transphobic or "not rp related"
All dwrp mods are whipped by people like you. It wasn't like this. Tumblr moment.
Re: UNPOPULAR DWRP OPINIONS
(Anonymous) 2024-06-19 12:43 pm (UTC)(link)Re: UNPOPULAR DWRP OPINIONS
(Anonymous) 2024-06-19 12:51 pm (UTC)(link)Ignoring a pro
Re: UNPOPULAR DWRP OPINIONS
(Anonymous) 2024-06-19 12:53 pm (UTC)(link)When you ignore a problem it only grows bigger. Why should we ignore this? Can I ask that?
Re: UNPOPULAR DWRP OPINIONS
(Anonymous) 2024-06-19 01:16 pm (UTC)(link)Re: UNPOPULAR DWRP OPINIONS
(Anonymous) 2024-06-19 02:10 pm (UTC)(link)Re: UNPOPULAR DWRP OPINIONS
(Anonymous) 2024-06-19 04:17 pm (UTC)(link)it puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the tags again
Re: UNPOPULAR DWRP OPINIONS
(Anonymous) 2024-06-20 01:40 am (UTC)(link)Re: UNPOPULAR DWRP OPINIONS
suddenly your fixation on them makes so much more sense
Re: UNPOPULAR DWRP OPINIONS
(Anonymous) 2024-06-20 02:18 am (UTC)(link)i'm inclined to believe this is a fairly universal thing
Re: UNPOPULAR DWRP OPINIONS
(Anonymous) 2024-06-20 06:47 am (UTC)(link)I live in Europe and there are constantly 200-500 applicants trying to get a job as a cashier or stocking shelves in supermarket, or any other low-paid job.
Last March it was in the news that 800 (!) people had applied for one single job to be a cashier at a movie theatre. There was a 4-stage recruitment process to weed out the "absolute best" candidate. It was a part-time job that pays 10-12 euros/hour.
Companies don't need 'hiring' signs on a window because they can get hundreds of applications just by posting an ad online.
Re: UNPOPULAR DWRP OPINIONS
(Anonymous) 2024-06-20 10:38 am (UTC)(link)Those signs can also just be total bullshit to keep the employees happy thinking that they will be getting help eventually or it’s code for “we have an internal person already in mind for this position but must post the job publicly as a requirement”.