wankgate | 251: back in my day wank meant something

251: back in my day wank meant something

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

can't believe caving to a tiny minority of shrieking anonymous complainers turned out to be a mistake

as opposed to the situation before, which was caving to an even tinier majority of shrieking anonymous trolls refusing to accept that their spam could be a problem

i meant in the mod contact post for bakerstreet. i sure hope they weren't taking cues from wg and rpa, places most rpers don't even visit.

i just checked out the report post and jfc, it's unhinged

the "um mods this ugly comic is about dv" is a really cherry on top

the comic is ugly though

and people wonder why bs mods have to be bombarded and prodded to do anything

i'd ignore half the shit on my report post too if this is what it's filled with on a regular basis

Idk how that one anon who reports memes constantly has the time. Do they not do tags?

anon

those ARE their tags

What if it’s button eyed muppet man reporting all the whoremonger memes

the probability of this is not zero. same as the probability of a corn of cob going through a windshield, which i learned today is also not zero.

all hail sir corn of cob, penetrator of cars

it's still working out great for me, but i am perfectly ok with scrolling back and tagging older memes

i know some of the complaining is coming from people who simply refuse to do that

i was a "just scroll" person before and for me nothing has changed except i occasionally see friends get confused that a post they were tagging in vanished lol

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

251: back in my day wank meant something

Re: BAKERSTREET

Re: BAKERSTREET

Re: BAKERSTREET

da

Re: da

+1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: BAKERSTREET

Re: BAKERSTREET