wankgate | 251: back in my day wank meant something

251: back in my day wank meant something

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

ngl my guy, you're in the wrong community, then. leaked deets are commonplace here. if that's against your personal ethics, totally fine, but grandstanding about 'snakes' on timelines here for a commonly accepted practice when the pastebin regards rp is incredibly tone deaf.

common things snakes say

are you lost

are you a snake

hiss hiss motherfucker

lmao ok dude, at least try not to show your hand this fast

ayrt

it's not grandstanding to personally hope that your friends aren't the kind of people who would come here to leak deets. i'm sure most people on this comm also don't want their shit aired here even if we hang out here on the regular. it is actually possible to think "this person is shitty" and "this situation is also shitty" at the same time.

easy solution, dont do shit that is worth leaking here

most people on this comm also wouldn't want their friends shit talking them and emotionally manipulating them regularly

begs the question why the leaker kept milk on their timeline in the first place

to provide a valuable public service

why does anyone stay with someone shitty that they shouldn't?

bc some of you milk stans have been out here crowing for deets while knowing their pattern of dirty deletes

lol

lmao even

nah, it's grandstanding. you've (presumably of your free will) come into a space where leaks are notoriously accepted and encouraged, and you're making a point of saying you sure hope you're not associating with people who leak. except you actually are, indirectly, by being here.

again, it's totally cool to find leaks unethical, we each draw our personal lines where we feel is right. but what are you doing here, then? most of the wank we get is the result of leaked pastebins. don't be a hypocrite.

the fact it's pastebins also means that the leaks could be completely fake. like we all fairly assume this isn't because the ambien routine is milk's jam and i totally believe it, but anyone can put anything in a pastebin so they're actually terrible for genuine deets that actually matter beyond stupid gossip

thankfully this ain't the place for things that actually matter

what does that have to do with the original argument? you're grasping at straws in such a bizarre way.

and ftr there have been instances of people faking deets and getting called out because, surprise: multiple people that visit this place can have the same person added and fact check. it's part of why people generally don't often try that shit. it's also why we get callouts when anons produce incomplete pastebins trying to make someone look bad.

look, i get it: you hate leaks. nothing wrong with that. but wankgate is never going to be the place for you, because this is what we do here. go hit up a volunteer organization or a library or pick up more shifts at work. whatever moral gratification you're hoping to achieve from wankgate i can guarantee to you is just never going to happen, because that isn't the purpose of this community. you're acting like someone who picked up a fork and is utterly bemused it isn't actually meant for combing mermaid hair.

pastebins are fake news. wg? totally unfair. it's a rigged system folks, totally rigged. wg is being weaponized by terrible crooked people.

they'll be drinking the milk by the time I'm done with them, that i can tell you.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

251: back in my day wank meant something

Re: milk

Re: milk

Re: milk

Re: milk

Re: milk

Re: milk

Re: milk

Re: milk

Re: milk

Re: milk

Re: milk

Re: milk

Re: milk

Re: milk

ayrt

Re: ayrt

Re: ayrt

Re: ayrt