Ryan Gosling (
ryanongosling) wrote in
wankgate2024-05-21 06:04 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
251: back in my day wank meant something

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.
Keep the rules in mind.
LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE
Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report stupid shit here.
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2024-07-02 01:01 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2024-07-02 01:26 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2024-07-02 04:47 pm (UTC)(link)couldn't have possibly foreseen that the game wanked on for having too-picky app standards on opening would do something like decline a character propped up on fetishy headcanons
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2024-07-02 06:03 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2024-07-03 06:44 am (UTC)(link)not because of shock or horror or anything we're just all fat
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2024-07-02 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2024-07-06 01:17 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2024-07-06 01:29 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2024-07-06 01:38 pm (UTC)(link)if it's a hard reject i don't think there's any app-revising outta that one, esp by peacock standards
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2024-07-06 02:03 pm (UTC)(link)wonder if they're planning on trying for another character or retry this one because that ain't working, chief
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2024-07-06 05:58 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2024-07-06 07:40 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2024-07-06 07:47 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2024-07-06 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2024-07-07 01:34 pm (UTC)(link)i've been in a couple games past where mods ended up having to do this lol. iirc it was dark that kept trying to get into one of them (submitting an app with the same auto-reject mistakes two times...)
it's valid to figure anyone would know better than to keep trying after the third or fourth rejection, but there are truly some people out there who either don't know how to take "no" for an answer or couldn't read a room if it were being actively narrated to them
Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2024-07-07 02:08 pm (UTC)(link)Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK
(Anonymous) 2024-07-06 05:34 pm (UTC)(link)