wankgate | 251: back in my day wank meant something

251: back in my day wank meant something

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Oh lmao I remember that. It was her defense that she was innocent and she was clearly the asshole in it. Her friends went dead quiet after she showed it, and two people were like “Sorry, this is a bad look for you actually.” And this was what she thought was okay to share.

I’m regretting I didn’t cap the plurk rn.

same. i only have the dm saved because i was laughing about it with someone unrelated. why would you ever dm someone and go "don't you ever tag me again because you're too slow and you drop everything" and think you came off looking good.

that just makes me wonder what was the point of chasing after them for ships

your ship can't be so special you'd seethe over a flake for it instead of just ship with someone else in a thirst game

dan heng isn't even an unpopular character so surely someone would have jumped on it asap even in the cast

The player turned down shipping with her so Alisa already hated them. Alisa is generally an unpleasant person once you’ve denied her a ship. She was seething to seethe.

wait this alisa person plays dan heng? do they also play any other hsr characters? could we get journal names?

idk if they do memes but as another hsr player myself i'd like to make sure to avoid tagging this person in the future if i can, just to dodge the headache

sorry, i just saw alisa's name and immediately avoided the HSR and BSD cast at the time because i didn't want to have anything to do with her. someone else might know her journals if she didn't nuke her muselist too.

muselist: https://boxofstrays.dreamwidth.org/1840.html

dan heng journal:

skypiercing

thanks anon

idk i feel like more people should tell flakes that, maybe they would get the hint and leave

Yeah, I'm actually puzzled now.

Telling someone that you don't want to tag them because of their chronic flaking sounds like a reasonable boundary to set. What's the rest of the context that makes her look like an asshole?

Ok for context, it wasn’t that they were a chronic flake. It was that they weren’t tagging as fast as Alisa wanted and because a few days had passed Alisa decided this meant that this person was avoiding her on purpose and didn’t want CR ever. Alisa was also mad because the player tagged another thread and not her thread. Mind you I think they’d only been tagging for a few weeks at most since this happened early on toward opening. It’s not like six months of slow threads were going on.

Alisa also accused them of causing a ton of problems in general and then said, literally, “so bye” without explaining what the alleged problems were. It was unhinged. Politely saying our paces don’t mesh would have been fine. Alisa didn’t do that.

What I gathered she was also stalking the Jing Yuan player’s threads, so I wouldn’t be surprised if she had a jealous fit.

You’re probably right.

Anyway, moral of the story is that Alisa is best avoided. Between her friends who love to blame the other person and her own snitty behavior, save yourself the migraine.

The other problems were the blade player stressing out a castmate and causing friction, so alisa asked them to dni because she was uncomfortable.

it was never about activity or shipping, alisa had only been in game 2 weeks and told them from the beginning they didn’t care if they shipped or not.

This feels like an attempt to rewrite wank

the other game she is in is full of flakes. alisa is a flake and barely tags, she has never had an issue with slow tags because if she did she would get laughed out of rp.

she talks about tagging more than she tag.

so saying this is about tag speed being her issue is odd.

correction: alisa never tags unless you are her current pet ship. then she'll boomerang with you for 100+ tags in a single day and expect new threads on the reg, while constantly telling her other cr she lost their tags in between crying about being slow and guilting people who bring it up.

totally new anon but whoever this person is aside, is it really bad to mostly rp long ship threads? i do that because shipping is fun and i'm here to have fun, and my multiple ships take up most of my tagging time. (i don't really post to gen memes so i don't have to lie about "lost tags" but i have definitely dropped stuff just because we didn't have writing chemistry.)

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2024-07-17 08:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2024-07-17 10:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2024-07-17 12:42 (UTC) - Expand

pretty sure the only one stressing them is alisa for being so obsessive about stalking their threads to see if they were tagging anyone more than her, especially with how unhinged she got about it

which is ironic because alisa herself is a damn flake trying to police other flakes for not tagging her as fast as she wants

From what I know, Alisa was the problem, full stop. The other players weren’t perfect but she was the one who got jealous, unhinged, and stalkery.

Blaming the other players is typical Alisa and the narrative she was swinging to cover her ass.

i know directly from involved players that alisa didn't care if she had a ship or not

c'mon, dude, even as a driveby anon uninvolved in any of this it's pretty transparent when there's wank about alissa and suddenly someone is REALLY concerned about the supposedly wanky castmates alissa thinks got her banned from golden peacock

"banned" being the important part. she did something bad enough to get banned. anything else just seems like splitting hairs

you're trying to deny the ship aspect but it doesn't change the fact that alisa became so unhinged about this player that even others who saw the cap knew it was unhinged.

i feel bad for the players she stalked and harassed, for whatever reason she did so. i also feel bad for the player she still shits on and blames for her ban, since it shows she has no plan on ever reflecting on herself. i hope more games keep her out.

please please share

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

251: back in my day wank meant something

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

DA

Re: DA

Re: DA

Re: DA

Re: DA

Re: DA

Re: +1

+1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

(no subject)

Re: +1

Re: +1

+1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1