Ryan Gosling (
ryanongosling) wrote in
wankgate2024-05-21 06:04 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
251: back in my day wank meant something

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.
Keep the rules in mind.
LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE
Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report stupid shit here.
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2024-08-01 03:04 am (UTC)(link)*played out dates and smut with, for that one pedantic anon that always cries about how it wasn't "shipping".
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2024-08-01 03:41 am (UTC)(link)I won't touch the other thing though I don't think it's true either I don't particularly care, writing smut with someone doesn't actually mean you're friends with them. But considering Art is already spreading bullshit around plurk about being utterly innocent of anything ever except one unfunny joke can we try to keep the deets dropped here less repetitively wrong before Art tries to tell everyone that wankgate backs them as a wonderful person to play with because that seems to be the kind of leap they take.
If there is even anywhere left Art is not banned from.
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2024-08-01 03:53 am (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2024-08-01 05:31 am (UTC)(link)my point is we can only jokingly blame mods for not being psychic about problem players, not seriously expect it.
this was probably way too constructive.
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2024-08-01 05:59 am (UTC)(link)da
(Anonymous) 2024-08-01 08:34 am (UTC)(link)obviously i could be wrong since i don't know any better than you do. but we'll never know.
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2024-08-01 10:49 am (UTC)(link)Re: da
(Anonymous) 2024-08-01 11:16 am (UTC)(link)Re: da
(Anonymous) 2024-08-01 03:39 pm (UTC)(link)the only exception imo would be something like a gonsai persistent concern trolling situation, but that's one of the good things about attitudes changing in recent years regarding player entitlement
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2024-08-01 04:01 pm (UTC)(link)ten years ago people would've said that was terrible and everyone was entitled to a slot in a game if they wanted it.
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2024-08-01 07:02 pm (UTC)(link)Re: da
(Anonymous) 2024-08-01 07:10 pm (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2024-08-01 04:32 am (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2024-08-01 04:48 am (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2024-08-01 05:55 am (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2024-08-01 06:45 am (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2024-08-01 07:44 am (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2024-08-01 08:09 am (UTC)(link)that was my first comment in this thread. no one had disagreed with me until you just did. you're probably not art though, the east coasters are all asleep