wankgate | 251: back in my day wank meant something

251: back in my day wank meant something

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

nfn anon but "you either thread with the npcs or your character is critically injured" does sound a lot like the players are being railroaded into it. there needs to be a compromise for players who want to participate in the plot but might also want to opt out of tagging certain players. considering how many people have brought up issues with pel in this thread it's clear that he's a polarising presence and requiring players to tag him is a poorly thought out decision.

"you either thread with the npcs or your character is critically injured" isn't what happened in game either.

the npc threading was a potential characters-get-plot opportunity for players who wanted it. anyone who didn't want to do it basically had it handwaved and had like a vial's worth of blood taken (this happened to characters who threaded it out too.)

Tbh i usually stay out of wg threads about games i'm in because, whatever, i'm here at the devil's sabbath too we're all here to bitch impotently or voyeur other people's bitching. but the weird bad faith misrepresentations of game plot are baffling.

i'm an active player and i haven't threaded with any of the npcs. at all. i dont care to, and i know i don't have to. if a person dislikes tagging with pel that much just opt out with him. by the accounts of anons who've complained, he's not a wanker or toxic harasser or what have you, they just find him off putting. just opt out of people who you think suck or whose characters you dislike

this has to be pel right

lmao no. i write much more coherently than pel does

you do

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

251: back in my day wank meant something

Re: da

da

Re: da

Re: da

also da