wankgate | 252: imagine all the tags sitting neglected in inboxes for this

252: imagine all the tags sitting neglected in inboxes for this

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

is that the jay who also played norman bates? because their takes were terrible

💀

your fucking character is unrecognizable it might as well be an oc with the character's face. just because it's a sex game doesn't mean you throw away everything ic about them. how the hell did the mods let you in?

at least tell us what canon, op

yes

but nobody is gonna tell you about them on wg

+1 wouldn't trust any fool on wankgate including myself

or just throw out an easy chewtoy like bakuho and let anons worry that for awhile if you don't want to out anyone

lbr it's not just about speed, but also about curating spaces free of randos that might cause drama otherwise, and skipping over the song and dance of anoncomm scrutiny and wank that every moderately-advertised public game still has to go through nowadays. modding a public game is asking for a headache. even bakerstreet meme play is commented on constantly here

it's always kind of funny when anons complain about how dead everything "looks" when it's at least partially a result of many players deciding they're happier in private friend circles that can't be snooped on anymore. like yeah you're def not seeing a lot of the rp that happens on dreamwidth anymore, bc people don't want you to

whether it's good or bad, it's where we are. maybe not super great for friendless fucks, ig. but i'm still finding plenty of meme and psl play even after going dm-only-ooc for nearly a year now, so even on the public front it's not completely barren just yet. but the migration to private stuff has been pretty substantial

this is seriously true. a lot of people have had to curate their rp space, bc the offcuts and unhappy randoms who come to hate on people in these comms are exhausting.

wishing au games would commit to au instead of trying to do awkward jamjar mashups every time

who am i kidding though, no one likes au games 😭

i like au games but not usually the ones i see? idk it has to have a cool setting and most seem kinda boring.

you know stuff other than mid shounen exists right

but then they'd just be playing different characters badly

it's fun to build up minor characters with what you're given tho

jesus christ please take your brainrot somewhere else i come to this hobby to get away from that asshole

i know it's fully possible that was a typo but i wanna believe it's intentional because "bakuho" is truly on point by dwrp standards lmao

+1 i love it

Bakuho was coined on the last post on wg or rpa I forget which

why has bakerstreet been so ass this week

absolutely no good characters being dropped

Prisma, towards the end of it's run. I don't think it ever reached anon comms at the time, which is a shame, because it was pretty wild.

even for akechi i see way less of the woobie stuff that ppl complain about, I think a lot of wankgate is stuck in a time warp between this and the komaeda mention

sure but you can't expect others to care esp about random mha student number 12 whose only trait is just being a nice guy

tbf it's been established that most wg visitors are old salty fucks that barely even rp anymore

so this would track lol

da

honestly if these people do want to get into gacha for a story they can just watch scenes on youtube anyway

literally just looked at the news.

i see what you did there.

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

Page 137 of 298

252: imagine all the tags sitting neglected in inboxes for this

no subject

no subject

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

no subject

no subject

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

no subject

no subject

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: ITT: CHARACTERS YOU NEVER SEE PLAYED WELL

Re: ITT: CHARACTERS YOU NEVER SEE PLAYED WELL

Re: ITT: CHARACTERS YOU NEVER SEE PLAYED WELL

(frozen comment) Re: ITT: CHARACTERS YOU NEVER SEE PLAYED WELL

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: ITT: CHARACTERS YOU NEVER SEE PLAYED WELL

da

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

ayrt

Re: ITT: CHARACTERS YOU NEVER SEE PLAYED WELL

Re: ITT: CHARACTERS YOU NEVER SEE PLAYED WELL

Re: ITT: CHARACTERS YOU NEVER SEE PLAYED WELL

Re: CLOVER

(frozen comment) Re: ITT: CHARACTERS YOU NEVER SEE PLAYED WELL