wankgate | 134: reading comprehension optional

lol.

watching you idiots flail around from your mom's basement, cheeto encrusted fingers clutching the keyboard desperately because you just can't bear having your precious little world view threatened by real facts has been the highlight of a slow week.

please. keep it coming. please.

and if anybody comes up with any actual sources to support your dance -not wikipedia, but actual cited sources with references i can dig into, i'll take those too. you won't find them because they don't exist, but the goose chase might accidentally teach you something your american public education failed to.

and sorry, must've missed the other two 'schooling' me. i don't sit around wg all day jerking off to my bad ass self. job, remember?

your ass is so blasted rn

keep the tryhard act coming your tears of impotent lesbo fury are delicious

ass blasted about how stupid and willfully ignorant people can be, yeah.

ass blasted personally? no. especially not when you're as far off the mark with calling me lesbo as that shit about me working for a radfem org.

keeping guessing. maybe someday you'll get closer and score a real point in something besides the idiot olympics.

popcorn.gif

yes yes we know you're not a radfem or a lesbo, you actually have a master's and a great paying job and you know everything there is to know about history and how ~~lesbians~~ lgbt actually had it so much better in the early 1900s and ~history is not just about progress~ etc etc

fess up, anon. who are you apologizing for? eugenicists? calvin coolidge? mayhaps herbert hoover?

could you at least try to be coherent?

i don't expect actual intelligence. i know that's acting for too much but just a little more pretending that you have some kind of point or stance or something? it's just no fun when you're doing the textual equivalent of foaming at the mouth and jibbering.

ah, and there you go again. when facts fail you, you can always fall back on your one limitless resource: childish arrogance

/pats head

it's okay, anon. i know it stings not to be right about everything

facts? what facts? if you were using facts we wouldn't be having this discussion.

seriously. try to find one or two and maybe we can go on. or just state opinion as fact some more. that was better than the directionless monkey jabber you've had going on the last couple of comments.

come on, i know you can do it if you try. you managed a few interesting comments before you were reduced to this.

shhh, shh, shhh. i know, baby, i know. just let it all know.

i know it's hard to click that little link labeled (Parent) that takes you up to all your embarrassing failures but you can do it if you really try

go ahead, nonnie. i have faith in you

man, i have given you all the ammo in the world to make real remarks and effective personal jabs and used actual cited resources in my actual arguments about the base issue.

you're just disappointing and sad.

maybe someone with more than their brain stem functioning can pick up where you left off.

> actual cited resources

tumblr doesn't count as a resource lmao

no, but academic articles and materials from the time period in question does, sunshine.

can't find that parent link?

academic articles and materials which you have utterly failed to provide

and a radfem's vanity project doesn't count either snookums

radfem. lol

sorry, i tried to keep it simple and free for your broke ass. i know you're going to be shocked by this, but most studies and academic journals require money to view.

http://ahr.oxfordjournals.org/content/91/5.toc.pdf&sa=U&ei=qYRfU7ruN-Pn8AHM_4CgCA&ved=0CD4QFjAH&usg=AFQjCNHJ7wJVQ_fxoKKRAD6U1TokqCEIqg

you'll have to register and pay to gain access and we know you'll use that as an excuse not to read the big words, but there were a couple of anons here who seemed both intelligent and employed who might find it a useful resource.

lots of links.

specific ones?

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02192822 this one's interesting,in spite of buzzwords in the title.

http://books.google.com/books?id=8mJN7pcpERAC&dq=lgbt+history+academic+article+1920s&lr=
this isn't academic, but it's interesting and the preview covers a lot for free.

http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=N195DslIA98C&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=lgbt+history+academic+article+1920s&ots=-1ZoHrImlP&sig=zPjCqCivtbl6PUoJJxswCWYalIQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

this book's kind of useless in some ways but the list of cited sources is decent and extensive, for anons motivated to dig in deeper (yeah, right)

all of it'll give you a decent look at what homophobia actually looked like at various points in history. i didn't bother with the more specific shit dealing with socioeconomics, race, gender, and geography.

very impressive but none of this actually proves your point, it's just a random collection of literally the results of googling 'lgbt history'

yawn

it'd prove my point if you fucking read it. sorry you were too lazy to do your own google search though and too unemployed, broke and lazy to read it :( i only specifically linked things i'm familiar with and actually paid to read though.

it's okay, someday you'll grow up and have resources off line, but until then i'll just spoon feed you shit i think anons might have some hope of getting to.

except that i did read it and none of it proves your point because you don't actually have a point as you just admitted to all of us over on flatviewland

you're just a buttmad lesbian mad at the world for viewing you as the abomination you are and so you must troll wg to release some of your seething fury

it's okay, i understand. not everyone can be pretty and educated and well-adjusted. in lack of those things, you are at least very dedicated?

unless you read at the speed of light you didn't read shit. you can't even have gained access to them yet.

it's okay, we know the big words are scary.

unless i actually have these materials already and you're just regurgitating information i long ago consumed, processed and shat out

it's okay, i know talking to someone with actual education isn't something you're used to

yeaaaah, sure, okay. you convinced me.

just ignore them, they're a homophobe who's really mad about this for some reason

i know. i'm not worked up. i doubt they are either. homophobic and dumb sure but otherwise it's a troll trolling and me playing with them.

bitch i'm the one playing with you

it's okay that way too. as long as we're both having a good time.

134: reading comprehension optional

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH

Re: ITT: THE RESULTS OF A GOOGLE SEARCH