wankgate | 161: because most of the people in this hobby are godawful writers

why don't you admit you have a fetish for white knighting murgy?

murgy has never flat-out denied being the third mod involved here. even kippur hasn't jumped up to defend her. if she wasn't involved why the hell not say so?

because afaik, she's never been the type to make plurks/posts about how uninvolved in things she is. she's 41, dude. she's not some drama student trying to play us all for fools. she was involved. she was part of the mod team. gen's been helpfully spreading misinformation to try to pass the buck, and when things started to get ugly, murgy dropped. why? because she can't handle drama and confrontation. being part of the mod team doesn't equal plotting the game's demise. you're really reaching. just admit you have a hateboner and want to shit on murgy for the pure fun of shitting on her.

LMAO why do you keep bringing up her age? there are plenty of people in rp who are in their forties who aren't constantly in the center of a damn wank tornado.

is she your rp mommy and that's why you feel the need to go all bear cub on the situation? because you sound super personally involved and invested in defending her.

it looks to me like this anon only posted her age once.

on the other hand, there are the grudgewankers to keep squawking about her age and how that magically removes gullibility.

i brought up something that's been brought up from both sides of this discussion because some people seem to think it's relevant. i'm an outside party. i'm not friends with her. i don't play with her. i'm not in any games with her. but outside parties can still pass by something that isn't right and stop and go 'hey, that isn't right'.

i'm an outside party to a lot of shit that happens here on wg and i pop my nose in a lot of times. i don't have to be so hurt and affected by this, or invested and totally in love with someone to have an opinion and voice it, anonly, on a place specifically for that.

inb4: if you're not involved, you shouldn't say anything. if you think only people that are involved in anything that happens on wg are the ones commenting, i have this really cool timeshare you might be interested in. judging by half the things i see on here about people, i see 'i don't know x, but____' a lot. and i don't know murgy, but judging by what i've seen in this thread and all the other clusterfucks happening because of this and past ones brought up re: boomtown, there just isn't any actual evidence or, you know, 'deets' pointing to murgy being anything more than a clueless dolt. she's not backstabby. she doesn't do things behind people's back. she doesn't do wanky things herself, she just has the bad fortune to constantly be around wanky jerks. calling someone out for being wanky by association when the wankers they're associating with aren't ken level rapists is pretty pathetic. the fact that someone or multiple someones keeps dropping here here and trying to claim that she's a wanker because... because? because she's boring. "no, it's not just that." okay, then what is it? "she's..." what? "it's not just that she's boring!!"

right. sure it's not. or maybe it's not, but no one has actually presented actual deets, screecaps, pastebins, or threads as proof that she's done anything. barring this single incident, even when asked 'what has she done?' the threads just fizzle out because nothing besides 'be boring' gets mentioned. and even now, the pastebin anon has said 'well, i'm being told that she okayed posting the second post, but my friend telling me this is being told this by gen'. that's... yeah. you call that deets if you want. just don't sit here wondering why people aren't taking it as gospel.

161: because most of the people in this hobby are godawful writers

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

Re: sa

ayrt