wankgate | 169: i just learned about this person and already i hate them

i'm kind of side eyeing the way you have kept on making this claim for years and years on this community and every time someone asks for proof on what is an extremely serious allegation, you waffle and give an excuse

you have absolutely NO PROOF WHATSOEVER? none? seriously? absolutely none? riley is still dragging her ass around the internet, they can still potentially hurt people. claiming something like this with no proof at all is some really serious shit, dude. we all hate her, but come on

and before anyone calls me an insensitive piece of shit: shut the fuck up. we've demanded proof on this community for allegations of abuse of a similar nature and i don't see why this should be any different

she's not on the registry, no one can find her in any court records, no one's ever produced even the slightest sliver of proof regarding riley being involved in a fucking international human trafficking ring

basically, put up or shut up

there are plenty of people that have committed sexual assaults/sexual misconduct that aren't registered anywhere. the only proof is from the people who've dealt with them or from their own mouth. second, funk, ken, stormy. i'm sure there are others. is stormy listed on a registry? second? how about funk or ken? probably not, you know why? because that requires actual court action, which doesn't happen with even a quarter of sexual assaults, let alone every one you've personally heard of.

so how about you take your 'we require receipts' bullshit and cram it up your ass?

post the receipts
o
s
t

t
h
e

r
e
c
e
i
p
t
s

you just want to rubberneck this trainwreck, don't you?

no, i don't. i'm just asking for what anons have been asking for ever since the claim was first made. when someone asks the most basic of questions for details on this allegation, the person who keeps insisting this happened makes an excuse and then mysteriously disappears and stops replying.

human trafficking is fucking beyond the pale of anything we have wanked about here. it's beyond ken and beyond stormy and beyond all of that shit. if you want to blindly nod your head and believe an anonymous person with literally nothing to back them up (when, in fact, simple research points out the holes in their allegations), then go ahead. i am not going to buy a ticket to that horror show. i'm not buying what they're selling until there is something, even the tiniest fraction, of substance.

it's not unreasonable to want just the tiniest sliver of proof. a court document with the names and identifying info blanked out. chat excerpts. a name that can be found on the registry. ANYTHING.

go ahead and be the muppet that just accepts this no questions asked. you do you and i'll keep asking for the proof.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdyaLWMt6qA

the problem here is that proof has been asked for and there's a sort of surprised answer of 'i wish i could give it to you, but i can't', because for some reason or another, it never was registered. in that case, continuing to bleat for proof doesn't make you look like you're actively giving a shit about this. they can't give you what they don't have. no one can. keep asking for proof of god, ffs, because that's what it sounds like. any party that's brought it up has wanted to bring proof because it would mean something had been done. sorry that the only proof that can be brought to you is that sometimes bad people get away with doing bad things.

keep asking for proof of god, ffs, because that's what it sounds like

no it's not you ninny

if you think about it for 0.2 seconds and rub two of your brain cells together hard enough, it literally makes no sense that there's ZERO PROOF AT ALL

exactly, you turdcicle. you can't show proof if you don't have any. if riley was never prosecuted or faced any charges, what exactly do you expect them to show you? proof of nothing? proof of frustration? proof of you being a fucking tool bag?

except that they claimed that it went to court

and that riley was declared a sex offender

pay attention dumdum

if you're going to claim someone was convicted of sexual assault or worse, you are going to be asked for proof. which, if someone was convicted, will exist.

and if you're accusing someone of something as heinous as human trafficking then yeah, you need to show proof. that's literally the basis of any reasonable system of accusations, having fucking proof. otherwise we might as well accuse every wanker we hate of human trafficking and then go "oh but i don't have proof :( just take my word for it :("

sometimes you can't prove tangible proof and that sucks, but you can't say someone was convicted of a sexual offense and then act like it's impossible to show proof. if someone was convicted in the usa, there will be records of it, esp for sexual offenses. esp esp when other people find flaws such as not finding them in the public sex offender registry.

before i go digging, can i ask exactly what would convince you? an order of protection against her?

keep in mind that i was a minor and some things are sealed, and i would prefer not to have my name attached, so most of the details are going to be covered, like my name, the cop's name, and so on.

tbh any kind of official documentation even with the names blacked out would lend some more water to your story. i personally believe you because every time youve shown up your story has been consistemt and it falls in line with stuff riley's said before about "training" girls, but i can see why anons would have reservations about believing you.

A document that actually links her to human trafficking is what I'd like to see. That's a serious accusation to throw around without proof.

I don't care if I can see your name, I just want to see proof that Nikkia Hanson was in court for charges related to sex trafficking.

Uh okay so.

This is really kind of a trainwreck, and I should really freeze it. I don't even know if anyone would accept your evidence, honestly.

If you do have something and you want to post it, your call, make a new namedrop thread -- just be aware it might get frozen again quickly.

169: i just learned about this person and already i hate them

(frozen comment) no subject

(frozen comment) no subject

(frozen comment) no subject

(frozen comment) no subject

(frozen comment) no subject

(frozen comment) no subject

(frozen comment) da

(frozen comment) Re: da

(frozen comment) Re: da

(frozen comment) Re: da

(frozen comment) Re: da

(frozen comment) no subject

(frozen comment) no subject

(frozen comment) da

(frozen comment) no subject