MATT

(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
http://xehalest.dreamwidth.org/1054.html

Re: MATT

(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 03:08 am (UTC)(link)
boring as fuck to write with, but why are you namedropping him?

Re: MATT

(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 10:03 am (UTC)(link)
it's like looking at that muse list full of blond white girls in reverse. it's just a sea of generic looking male modelesque bad actors in uncanny valley

Re: MATT

(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 07:47 pm (UTC)(link)
and this is a namedrop why? "this person exists" is not wankworthy.

Re: MATT

(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)
me thinks this is an attempt at grudgewank

Re: MATT

(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)
How so?

Re: MATT

(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
A glorious and shining lack of anything even remotely like a fresh deet in the thread.

da

(Anonymous) 2016-12-26 03:56 am (UTC)(link)
^ this

it smells of grudgewank because it's completely deetless.

Re: MATT

(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Hi Brandon.

Re: MATT

(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Brandon isn't even around anymore

Re: MATT

(Anonymous) 2016-12-26 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
he's returned

saw him hitting up like every tvd and tw character on the last tfln

Re: MATT

(Anonymous) 2016-12-26 03:59 am (UTC)(link)
His thirst was really embarrassing there. He bombarded some top levels with three or more different characters in succession.

Re: MATT

(Anonymous) 2016-12-26 04:11 am (UTC)(link)
deets?

da

(Anonymous) 2016-12-26 04:28 am (UTC)(link)
on the thirst or brandon?

The former is really just as said, the latter:

https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/30974.html?thread=113697022#cmt113697022

http://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/7226.html?thread=17587002#cmt17587002

He was name dropped before although there's nothing about his beef with xehalest there that I can see.

Re: MATT

(Anonymous) 2016-12-27 05:12 am (UTC)(link)
sameface boring self inserts

so basically he's every female LA player in man form

Re: MATT

(Anonymous) 2017-01-04 10:13 pm (UTC)(link)
> 4. Threads "fishing" for wank baselessly are at risk for deletion. This rule covers, in particular, threads that namedrop a player without recent suspicion/experience/proof of wanky behavior, threads that exhaustively list the accounts of targeted players, and threads aimed at digging up the player or past of a certain account without any observed present wrongdoing. This rule is not meant to prevent identification of players known for stalking, harassing, or chronically abusive behavior. This rule does not require that all namedrops include "hard evidence" of wrongdoing. It exists to prevent drama from being "manufactured" and simply asks that discussions begin with a focus on current developments; this rule will be always be enforced with context in mind, and with sensitivity to exceptional cases.

> blatant fishing thread left up for 10+ days


not sure if this is proof that wankknight is awbrey or just proof that the wg mods completely do not care anymore

Re: MATT

(Anonymous) 2017-01-04 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)
presuming you squalling titfants reported it to begin with and it hasn't been dealt with in spite of that report, note it says "at risk for deletion" not "we will nuke everything that flusters your over-invested booty"

Re: MATT

(Anonymous) 2017-01-04 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)
get over your grudgeboner awbrey

if you absolutely must have a neckbeard to wank on, antman's back and he's far more deserving than this utter milquetoast

Re: MATT

(Anonymous) 2017-01-05 06:15 pm (UTC)(link)
sorry for your desperation to blame some bint i don't know, i'm one of the anons way up calling this a pointless grudge thread but if you chucklefucks don't even have the brains to report the thread you don't get to whine when it doesn't vanish on its own

Re: MATT

(Anonymous) 2017-01-04 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)
this thread wasn't reported until a day ago and it usually takes a day or more for threads to be dealt with if the mods aren't online at the time. not everything is a conspiracy, anon.