it's like looking at that muse list full of blond white girls in reverse. it's just a sea of generic looking male modelesque bad actors in uncanny valley
> 4. Threads "fishing" for wank baselessly are at risk for deletion. This rule covers, in particular, threads that namedrop a player without recent suspicion/experience/proof of wanky behavior, threads that exhaustively list the accounts of targeted players, and threads aimed at digging up the player or past of a certain account without any observed present wrongdoing. This rule is not meant to prevent identification of players known for stalking, harassing, or chronically abusive behavior. This rule does not require that all namedrops include "hard evidence" of wrongdoing. It exists to prevent drama from being "manufactured" and simply asks that discussions begin with a focus on current developments; this rule will be always be enforced with context in mind, and with sensitivity to exceptional cases.
> blatant fishing thread left up for 10+ days
not sure if this is proof that wankknight is awbrey or just proof that the wg mods completely do not care anymore
presuming you squalling titfants reported it to begin with and it hasn't been dealt with in spite of that report, note it says "at risk for deletion" not "we will nuke everything that flusters your over-invested booty"
sorry for your desperation to blame some bint i don't know, i'm one of the anons way up calling this a pointless grudge thread but if you chucklefucks don't even have the brains to report the thread you don't get to whine when it doesn't vanish on its own
this thread wasn't reported until a day ago and it usually takes a day or more for threads to be dealt with if the mods aren't online at the time. not everything is a conspiracy, anon.
MATT
(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 12:56 am (UTC)(link)Re: MATT
(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 03:08 am (UTC)(link)Re: MATT
(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 10:03 am (UTC)(link)Re: MATT
(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 07:47 pm (UTC)(link)Re: MATT
(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)Re: MATT
(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)Re: MATT
(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)da
(Anonymous) 2016-12-26 03:56 am (UTC)(link)it smells of grudgewank because it's completely deetless.
Re: MATT
(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)Re: MATT
(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)Re: MATT
(Anonymous) 2016-12-26 03:48 am (UTC)(link)saw him hitting up like every tvd and tw character on the last tfln
Re: MATT
(Anonymous) 2016-12-26 03:59 am (UTC)(link)Re: MATT
(Anonymous) 2016-12-26 04:11 am (UTC)(link)da
(Anonymous) 2016-12-26 04:28 am (UTC)(link)The former is really just as said, the latter:
https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/30974.html?thread=113697022#cmt113697022
http://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/7226.html?thread=17587002#cmt17587002
He was name dropped before although there's nothing about his beef with xehalest there that I can see.
Re: MATT
(Anonymous) 2016-12-27 05:12 am (UTC)(link)so basically he's every female LA player in man form
Re: MATT
(Anonymous) 2017-01-04 10:13 pm (UTC)(link)> blatant fishing thread left up for 10+ days
not sure if this is proof that wankknight is awbrey or just proof that the wg mods completely do not care anymore
Re: MATT
(Anonymous) 2017-01-04 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)Re: MATT
(Anonymous) 2017-01-04 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)if you absolutely must have a neckbeard to wank on, antman's back and he's far more deserving than this utter milquetoast
Re: MATT
(Anonymous) 2017-01-05 06:15 pm (UTC)(link)Re: MATT
(Anonymous) 2017-01-04 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)