Re: +3

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
shit no i'm thinking of patch, sorry anon

hedge still sucks tho

Re: +3

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
patch hasn't been seen in dwrp for literally years anon

are you ok

Re: THE QUIET PLACE

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
I'm really curious how this game was put together long before this movie premiered. Did they really pull that much from the trailer or something?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Quiet_Place_(film)

Re: MOST TOXIC PLAYERBASES

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
Deets on amat drama?

Re: CHARACTERS YOU WANT TO APP BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 01:21 am (UTC)(link)
but anon, he's so handsome and he cooks such nice meals!!


is this why nobody figures out he's eating people for ages in his actual canon too

Re: CHARACTERS YOU WANT TO APP BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
it also doesn't help that female characters tend to be held to a higher standard when it comes to shipping. if you seek out m/f you're a thirsty cockhop. if you seek out f/f you're an ooc neckbeard. if you play the female half of a canon ship, you need to have your character pining for the other half for the rest of your days in game. if your character isn't in a canon ship then that's just proof that they must be chaste and pure no matter how old they are. is it any wonder why male characters are more popular?

Re: CHANNEL AWESOME

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 01:29 am (UTC)(link)
Early on, she did an episode on Mulan and kept bringing up foot binding for some fucking reason.

well foot binding is relevant to the original story of mulan so that's probably why

Re: CHANNEL AWESOME

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
foot binding is still an issue for some women from places that practice it. it's mostly outdated now, but there are living examples of women with permanent disfigurement from it.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
yeah like i'm sorry but i'm not gonna just believe shit some rando says on the internet when their only "proof" is some suspiciously cropped screencaps because i've seen way too many shooped vendettas over the years.

Re: CHARACTERS YOU WANT TO APP BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
Vegeta. I don't care about what the scouter says about his power level, I really like his character development over the course of the series and I really like where he is at the end of Super.

Why won't I app: dragon ball.

Re: CHARACTERS YOU WANT TO APP BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
actually in the novels, yes

the only reason he gets caught in the first place is by being a pretentious shit with his crime scenes

Re: CHARACTERS YOU WANT TO APP BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
yeah it'd be a very unique thing to play out. obvs a lot depends on whatever the actual setting of the game is, but seeing as a lot of dwrp games are larger-than-life in their own right, it wouldn't be surprising if her in-game worst-case scenario downward spiral involved starting to suspect that this isn't really the "real world" she's been dreaming of all this time either, and is just some kind of other different "game" where strings are being pulled by some other force beyond--again--and she's just can't perceive the string-pulling this time, which is almost worse in its own way. (this would also be appropriately accurately meta in its own right, har har canon consistency)

and even if she doesn't get that bad there's also the ongoing existential crisis of being essentially a computer program who can never be anything more, even in this "real world", no matter how hard she tries to hide her robotness. cue maybe trying to get closer and closer to being "human" via upgrades if the game allows it or something, uncanny valley side-effects likely. trying to cope with that shit in general's bound to be interesting

tbh all this is infinitely more appealing to ,e than trying to launch a ship with her at some point in-game (and she'll probably be holding a torch for ddlc's mc for some time anyhow lbr), but ngl if she ended up falling for some poor unsuspecting sap her age and started getting very alarming about it that'd just be more frosting on the weirdness pie. (with extensive discussion and go-ahead from the other player ofc). so many possibilities, so little time...but i hope one day i can pull it off too anon

Re: Strangest Cross-Medium Interaction?

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 01:57 am (UTC)(link)
Well, I'm surprised

Re: CHARACTERS YOU WANT TO APP BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
there are a couple of insane villains that i think would be fun to play just for the hell of it but i can never really bring myself to play (let alone app) them anywhere. mainly because keeping up that much insanity would be hard and draining.

Re: CHARACTERS YOU WANT TO APP BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 02:08 am (UTC)(link)
oh my god

as a canonblind driveby this gave me a good laugh, thanks

gd charismatic-ass villains and their surprisingly-difficult-to-implicate people-eating hobbies

Re: MODS' PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
This. In my game, we have a warning list, but you still can't pass AC for a month with threads that happen after the month is over. If you didn't already do the activity and just forgot to hit up the entry, the warning list isn't going to save you.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
Honestly everyone in there seems very reasonable? I was expecting to at least see an argument but they're just discussing the missteps and deciding to keep things simple.

Re: CHARACTERS YOU WANT TO APP BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 02:32 am (UTC)(link)
they're never crazy-interesting players, they're always crazy-how-did-you-survive-into-adulthood-by-being-that-fragile players

Re: CHARACTERS YOU WANT TO APP BUT NEVER WILL

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 02:33 am (UTC)(link)
it's actually pretty hilarious, since he flies under the radar for so long because he hangs out with rich people and throws fancy dinner parties and everybody loves him. the only reason he gets caught is because he recreates the Wound Man on a victim and one of the investigators (Will Graham) comes around to his office later to ask him some questions, notices the Wound Man diagram he has, and then Hannibal straight up stabs him

and in the tv series while everyone is agonizing over who the ripper is, there's hannibal in the corner making oblique cannibalism jokes to entertain himself

+1

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 02:34 am (UTC)(link)
"like they're not even being true to their canon" - ugh, too real. As a TAZ rper myself, this seems to be a problem with ninety percent of the others I've encountered in the wild

Re: MOST TOXIC PLAYERBASES

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
That tinfoil theory wouldn't surprise me in the slightest. The mods and their team of ass-lickers took it very personally that anyone would ever assume a game needed a smut AC and they threw a huge tantrum when CoA was announced. Unsurprisingly, they did a good deal of the shitstirring and backstabbing in Zodion, too.

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 02:36 am (UTC)(link)
make me bite the pillow harder, daddy.

iyaan~

Re: MOST TOXIC PLAYERBASES

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 02:39 am (UTC)(link)
as the anon that initially suggested a smut ac for coa, i will never regret that decision.

Re: different DA

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 02:39 am (UTC)(link)
on one hand, it would cost more money to add/edit new logos.

on the other hand... yeah, that's dumb as shit, lmao.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 02:43 am (UTC)(link)
I have no desire to support any company that does this to their retail employees or unskilled labor positions of any kind. It is shady as fuck.