Re: EL NYSA

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
enjoy having pumpkin's shit loki in your game

and jenna, too.

el nysa: attracting all the best players.

Re: EL NYSA

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
do you like chocolate cake? i sure do

Re: EL NYSA

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 05:22 am (UTC)(link)
how artistic of you

Re: EL NYSA

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 04:59 am (UTC)(link)
who are these people

(Anonymous) 2018-04-03 05:25 am (UTC)(link)
idk about pumpkin but this is jenna: https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/53142.html?thread=204330902#cmt204330902

Re: EL NYSA

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 04:34 pm (UTC)(link)
you are the most dedicated grudgewanker i've ever seen.

Re: EL NYSA

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 04:40 pm (UTC)(link)
i don't know about jenna, but pumpkin's loki IS shit. that's not really grudge so much as objective truth, though it's not like she's the only shitty loki player out there. she's just really, really dumb and gossipy on top of that.

the bigger problem is it speaks to a total lack of standards on the app team's side. there have been quite a few people getting in that had me raising eyebrows, mainly because i know they can't write for beans. slackening app standards is the first stage of game decay and it's already setting in tbh.

Re: EL NYSA

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 04:44 pm (UTC)(link)
you realize no one's been accepted or rejected right? apps are still open and they just posted received apps. unless someone's a massive wanker you can't just ban shitty players from apping.

maybe check to see if they're actually in-game before stroking your hateboner

Re: EL NYSA

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 04:48 pm (UTC)(link)
i didn't mean this app round, though i'm sure it'll happen, but yes you actually can reject shitty players from apping. that's the whole point of an app round, that's the whole point of maintaining quality control and WRITING an app. to show you can play that character with reasonable competency.

seriously, look at any game that's died a slow miserable death in the past two years (as in not wank, unexpected closure, etc.) and it almost always started with app trouble. it's a pretty good indicator of game health, and when standards are bad, the game is suffering.

Re: EL NYSA

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 04:53 pm (UTC)(link)
if you hate these two people so much then ignore them? i'm really not sure what the problem is.

Re: EL NYSA

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 04:57 pm (UTC)(link)
anyone can submit an app, dumbass. that doesn't mean they're accepted. not to mention, it doesn't sound like either of these idiots are stormy or ken tier so i don't see why they'd be pre-banned from apping in the first place.

Re: EL NYSA

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 04:59 pm (UTC)(link)
it's a systemic issue and a sign of a bigger problem. but i'm clearly not getting anywhere this, so i'll be on my way.

Re: EL NYSA

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 05:14 pm (UTC)(link)
it's also subjective. remember the app rubric for coa? remember how strict some games were with their demanded thesis for apps? and all those games still had shitty, ooc versions of characters, because apps are not as effective as people want them to be. the shittiest player can shit out an app. the best player can have trouble writing an app. and apps don't guarantee that people will stick to what they cobbled together to get in a game. the app process as a whole is glitched, but this is what we have for the medium we're on and that's just how it goes.

you're welcome to make your own app rules for your own game, but this is what people are used to and you're always going to vary in quality, even with the same processes.

+1

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 04:56 pm (UTC)(link)
the fact that apps aren't even processed makes this wank even funnier.

Re: EL NYSA

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 04:45 pm (UTC)(link)
even the shittiest writers can fake a good app

Re: EL NYSA

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 04:49 pm (UTC)(link)
this i don't disagree with, and unfortunately i don't think there's any way around that other than checking samples closely and sniffing around if you suspect something. but otherwise, yeah, shitty writers can and still do sneak in.

Re: EL NYSA

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 05:10 pm (UTC)(link)
if it's objective truth then where are your deets?

Re: EL NYSA

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 06:09 pm (UTC)(link)
It's been some time ladies and gentlemen but we have an exciting duscovery for you today! A sighting of the noble Deetless Chickenfucker! As you know the Deetless Chickenfucker is a subspecies of the Grudgewanker, but I personally find it a little more majestic.

See how he defends his territory when threatened with a series of unique calls and displays to confuse and confound any would-be predators. Truly a magnificent creature.

Re: EL NYSA

(Anonymous) 2018-04-05 10:42 pm (UTC)(link)
all the pumpkin and jenna whiteknights itt already

and protip: warning for problem players that could be entering your game isn't grudgewank. hth.