Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-13 05:29 pm (UTC)(link)
these people are incorrigible

props to you, pastebinner, just let these fools keep making an ass out of themselves and document everything

like i know 200 PAGES if a meme at this point but it's also solid proof of wrong-doing that the asshats involved can no longer deny

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-13 05:53 pm (UTC)(link)
speaking of documenting here's a plurk luc made about this stuff coming to light the night before, of course it's been deleted since but it's pretty fucking appalling

https://imgur.com/a/SlaJBYm

list of players i know:

bunnie trap - luc
trek
problematic leg - plus
bruno pls - yume
how unfortunate - batty
octonami - harmony
nightwing - shikki
hakurei - anna

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-13 05:58 pm (UTC)(link)
"The trash takes itself out when I'm around."

if that's true i think you're the trash people are tired of smelling. rarely does actual trash on this site ever take itself out.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-13 05:59 pm (UTC)(link)
well this is all just very disgusting.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-13 06:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Yikes

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-13 06:21 pm (UTC)(link)
funny how it's fine to violate rin's privacy by having naem go and screencap their plurk for him but it's bad when people do it to luc

━BIG SH✪T☆゚.*・。
THEY'RE GONNA MAKE CARBON OUT TO BE A LIAR?

triska
that sounds SUPER FUCKING FAKE, because rin said TO CARBON that they told luc not to contact them

Naem
god i'm sorry i feel like i'm being extremely gossipy

ᴄᴀᴛʙᴏx
Naem: this one which specifically happened after all the DNI-ing went down

Naem
wait hold on. now i have to double-check

Naem
because i don't want to accidentally be a liar

━BIG SH✪T☆゚.*・。
Birthday Dad: 100% and i think that you're doing it very well ic, i think Phoenix SHOULD feel apprehensive and I trust you very much

Naem
ah yes i did see that one

Birthday Dad
wait wait wait what is this about me being a liar? LOL

Naem
ok let me. try to find that plurk. unless i dreamed about it

ᴄᴀᴛʙᴏx
which like. that one was what made me go something is incredibly fucked up here because that was after, at the very least, luc made that wonderful crit on the hmd about "maybe stop assuming maya is brainwashed???"

━BIG SH✪T☆゚.*・。
naem's gonna find it

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-13 06:33 pm (UTC)(link)
naem is shady af and then shakes and cries about it

some honest to god advice: stop doing this and you won't have anxiety my buddy in christ

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-13 07:09 pm (UTC)(link)
do none of these idiots have discord, why are they doing this in front of god and everyone

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-13 19:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-13 19:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-13 19:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-13 06:53 pm (UTC)(link)
"if you don't want people talking shit about your friends, simply have better friends"

ok well bye then

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-13 08:25 pm (UTC)(link)
not surprised that came from trek, they're pretty openly an asshole at all times to all people.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-13 07:57 pm (UTC)(link)
shikki talking about how it's cowardly to go anon when they're known to monitor wg lmao

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-13 10:45 pm (UTC)(link)
"ngl the fact that people won't speak up directly is the most cowardly thing""

they did speak up directly

you and your mean girls battalion threw them under the bus, pointed at them, and laughed at them

you're still doing it now, you're doing it in this plurk, this one, right here

i swear these people are completely detached from reality, maybe ryslig really does exist in a different dimension

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-13 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)
completely unsurprised. shikki's takes are always fairly batshit

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-13 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)
They don't even want people to speak directly, they want them to speak privately so they can exaggerate what was said to them. It's all public now and they're losing their minds because only they think their behavior is sane and okay and it's a reality check they're not prepared for.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-13 22:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-23 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
this person is friends with trek and you're somehow surprised that they're an asshole

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-14 06:54 am (UTC)(link)
https://tinyurl.com/2p847mvm

Doesn't know the difference between harassment and a call out post and neither does anyone else. For context, they're talking about vent art.

Also, "I didn't make anyone pick sides, but-" which he uses often.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-14 07:06 am (UTC)(link)
ah I see Nigh, Anne, and Naem are here. lol Naem really wanted everyone to believe that oh n-no this was a m-misunderstanding bitch please

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-14 07:08 am (UTC)(link)
does naem know they're the peter pettigrew of this situation or
like the sniveling sidekick that plays both sides poorly

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-14 03:19 pm (UTC)(link)
are we really shocked about anne, given her track record

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-14 10:49 am (UTC)(link)
it's frankly jaw dropping that they still think this "outrage" is about Pan or whoever their villain of the day was

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-14 01:10 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah it's extremely weird since they talked mad shit about several other people on that plurk. you can easily find the links to the screencaps of private plurks/convos they posted.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-15 04:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Again: this has ALSO not been Luc's screen name for months (possibly even years?), and it's pretty sus how these pastebins keep cropping up with, conveniently, no dates attached and the unspoken implication that they're recent.

so, regardless of whether or not Luc is a dick... this is clearly not about the current situation? You can make a case for it fitting into a larger pattern, but that's not what this comment implies.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-15 04:13 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah but their responses getting fucking pissed about people daring to say theyre behaving badly and getting pissed off about their privacy being breached when their buddies were doing the exact same thing to someone else in the paste theyre mad about are both very recent and show very little growth, anon

AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 16:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 16:29 (UTC) - Expand

AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 16:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 16:35 (UTC) - Expand

AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 16:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 16:54 (UTC) - Expand

SA

(Anonymous) 2022-05-15 04:17 pm (UTC)(link)
For the record, Luc's current display name is "bunny☆trap" and he changed it before the shit hit the fan, so until and unless he changes it again (at which point I'm sure someone will highlight it) you should assume that any plurk pastebin where his display name is NOT bunny☆trap is from before the 200-page pastebin dropped.

in b4 "stop defending him!!!": this has nothing to do with Luc's behaviour and everything to do with the fact that muddying the waters like this is just super fucking unhelpful to everyone involved. Especially if you actually want to call people out for stuff that happened.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-15 04:19 pm (UTC)(link)
there are screenshots in here somewhere from luc raging about it like TWO DAYS AGO with the same tone and same bullshit so there's nothing sus.

by your own admission luc hasn't used those names in months. months and not a bit of positive growth, only worse behavior because now he's going after non-wankers who are a little annoying at best and have done nothing.

AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 16:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 16:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 21:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 22:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 16:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 17:01 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 16:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 16:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 16:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 16:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 17:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 17:12 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 17:26 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 18:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 18:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-16 01:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 20:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-16 01:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-16 03:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-16 02:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 20:10 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 20:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 22:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 22:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 22:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 22:27 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 20:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 20:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 21:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2022-05-15 20:06 (UTC) - Expand