Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 05:10 am (UTC)(link)
exactly. the plurk exists. people are free to replurk it if they want. the fact that no one is even doing that is a pretty big sign that no one cares.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 05:36 am (UTC)(link)
seems like OP is trying to add supporting details to bump it in the form of digging up old plurks to take screenshots of as evidence but the evidence isn't exactly damning when it's just screenshots of someone peacefully accepting the ruling that they've been banned so i can't imagine why no one cares

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 06:30 am (UTC)(link)
it's really unfortunate that pastebin doesn't easily allow searching anymore, because that was how you found the really good old deets, but there is this! this is the big rpanons ban.

https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/61712.html?thread=242361360#cmt242361360

and since you guys are worried that the wankgate name will chase people off:

the original thread that sparked the logged in meltdown: https://rpanons.dreamwidth.org/85878.html?thread=258069878#cmt258069878

pastebin of the meltdown: https://pastebin.com/US2y03fa

rpanon mod confirming that the original thread was gonsai and that they were such a piece of shit that the mods banned every account they have: https://rpanons.dreamwidth.org/85878.html?thread=258124662

this happened in 2021. this gives the context for why they were so set on lying about who was modding this game. they are still acting the way they did in 2009, and 2011, and 2015, and today. because gonsai will never change, and the next meltdown isn't an "if," but a "when."

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 06:45 am (UTC)(link)
this is apparently one of the threads given for "examples of gonsai acting like a douchebag to someone for absolutely zero reason:" https://rpanons.dreamwidth.org/85735.html?thread=257760743#cmt257760743

here are two more, but gonsai's comments were deleted, so you only get the bewildered responses: https://rpanons.dreamwidth.org/85878.html?thread=257794934#cmt257794934
https://rpanons.dreamwidth.org/85878.html?thread=257803126#cmt257803126

and, for fun, a latroma namedrop they were the most obvious anon ever on: https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/40365.html?thread=159278509#cmt159278509

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 10:19 am (UTC)(link)
shame their comments got deleted because i remember them and they were absolutely unhinged even by anon standards, unrelentingly aggro and complete with namedrops/accusing random anons of being dwrpers they've had fallings out with (a gsai classic move)

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 06:50 am (UTC)(link)
I'm sorry but I read through this waiting for the great big horrible thing that has everyone so upset about this and I don't see it?

It's exhausting and embarrassing but it seems like they're doing just fine getting themselves banned from things. I'm just wondering why this is PSA-worthy stuff especially compared to the other wankers we've seen that have been toxic and abusive in ways that got other people in trouble while they got away with it scot-free.

People should know so they can opt-out if they want to, but compared to other wankers this is pretty mild stuff ngl.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 06:52 am (UTC)(link)
It's the end of the Streisand effect. Gsai won't stop defending themself here, anonymous get whipped up in a frenzy proving someone wrong on the internet, and the entire situation ends up sucking up too much oxygen.

+1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 06:55 am (UTC)(link)
Gsai is extremely annoying which is why they got banned from rpanons but no one has ever brought home the deets of any direct harassment. No amount of vomiting up links will change that.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 06:59 am (UTC)(link)
This seems like the most likely story. There was even another anon in here that admitted that they told them they wanted to opt out of playing with them and they calmly honored the request so I'm really having a hard time believing these anons who act like this is the worst wank on wg.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 07:03 am (UTC)(link)
you don't have to be the worst person that ever existed to make lying bad, gonsai. you can just be a big asshole that likes to stir wank and has secret access to a mod inbox.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-10 03:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 09:41 am (UTC)(link)
one more time, it is harassment within the legal definition of the term to anonly mod people who have asked not to play with you, because they have established that they don't want contact but you're making contact with them anyway.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-10 13:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 04:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 04:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 04:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 05:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 05:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 05:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 08:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 11:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 10:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 10:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 06:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 07:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 07:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 09:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 10:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 07:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 09:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 09:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 06:55 am (UTC)(link)
because gonsai wants to continue shadowmodding jigokucho. none of those other toxic and abusive wankers are trying to secretly run a game because they know their openly modding it would mean it'd be less popular. none of this would be coming up otherwise because, otherwise, gonsai doesn't matter.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 06:57 am (UTC)(link)
what

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 07:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 07:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 07:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 07:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 07:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 07:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 08:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 09:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 09:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 10:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 12:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 12:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 11:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 12:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 18:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 18:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 18:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 18:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 18:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 18:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 18:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 03:31 pm (UTC)(link)
quix literally just tried secretly running a game and surprise, the game blew up. at least gsai isn't forcing everyone to tag their sex slave blorbo as a substitute for a game plot afaik.

[personal profile] onlyg since you're reading this you better not let this comment age poorly

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 16:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 10:16 am (UTC)(link)
please stop with the "i'm just asking questions!!! i have no agenda!!!" bait rhetoric

please stop minimizing gsai's shit while you're at it, too. other wankers being worse doesn't make shadowmodding a game explicitly to draw in people who'd otherwise avoid it, not bad.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-12 05:03 am (UTC)(link)
you're right. it couldn't possibly be because someone with a bad reputation happened to have a good game idea and wanted to see it succeed. clearly, it was a nefarious and malicious action directed specifically at every person that dislikes them.

regardless of whatever this person has done in the past, it doesn't make anon reactions look any less grudgy and irrational in the present. when you app into a game with anon mods, you always run the risk that it's gonna be run by someone you hate. that's just the reality of it.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 05:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 09:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 09:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 10:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 13:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 13:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 18:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 18:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 19:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 20:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 20:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 23:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 23:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 11:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 17:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 18:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-12 19:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 07:42 am (UTC)(link)
to me the musebox meltdown is still one of the funniest things ever produced by these communities

it's just so SO dumb and they care so much

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 10:32 am (UTC)(link)
the plurk itself IS very "wow! it's fucking nothing"

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 02:23 pm (UTC)(link)
keep telling yourself that, gsai

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 02:26 pm (UTC)(link)
oh nice my first gsai accusation in this thread

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 02:45 pm (UTC)(link)
fine then

keep telling yourself that, jigofucker

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 14:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2022-09-09 14:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 02:30 pm (UTC)(link)
it was meant to be evidence of gsai's various bans, not their shitty behavior

as in, that was the order of priorities

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 06:49 am (UTC)(link)
If only 7 people have reported it, we haven't seen the plurk existing. Can we get a link or something

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 06:52 am (UTC)(link)
https://www.plurk.com/p/ozh7oy

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-09 06:53 am (UTC)(link)
Thanks, anon.