wankgate | 251: back in my day wank meant something

251: back in my day wank meant something

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

unless they're running a very tiny game, most mods won't go through the hassle of cross referencing who all has done their paperwork before accepting them into the comms. they'll just batch accept requests because it's easier and there are a million other things to do.

Disagree.

When you get accepted into a game, it's on you to follow the rules. Mods don't have to hold your hand and give you gentle reminders to follow clear rules they gave you. It's not shit mod behavior to not baby and hold an adult accountable for not following instructions.

It also says right in the page if there are problems after AC is processed, it's on you to follow up on it.

• If there was a mistake in our processing, feel free to let us know on this page.

Feel free to shoot any questions to this page or the FAQ page. Thanks, and happy dreaming!

The player fucked up. Stop trying to excuse them.

the player messed up AND they reconciled the issue with the mods with no friction or drama between them whatsoever, that's what really makes this ridiculous

which shows that someone was really eager to run here to find any reason to grudgewank against the mods because they have their own personal beef with them.

this shit is why so many people don't want to mod anymore.

if it's a capped game, u right

if it's not, who cares

and ngl i'm not going to tag that player after this because if this is how their friends behave, then i want nothing to do with them

This is the third time this game has had weird as fuck nothing burger wank that turned out to be nothing but SOMEONE grudging on the mods.

It's all turned out like this every time.

because tai is a self-centered piece of shit, they stand out in a whole community of assholes because of their past and current actions. there's no such thing as a good-faith reading of anything when it comes to them

yeah, i want to dogpile on tai. they deserve it, especially after leaving that kind of comment about someone who is generally well-liked in the community.

That's not really a fair assumption. The player probably had nothing to do with it, they were pretty reasonable with the mods and worked it out by communicating like an adult.

This is probably the exact same grudgewanker who keeps trying to drag Lab's mods every single time.

seriously wondering what your real damage is with the mods because you keep trying to burn this game down over literally nothing and all you're doing is getting the people whose minor issues you use as bait blamed for it.

just tell us what you're really bootybothered about, nonny. it will feel better.

someone really has a hard-on for lab's mods. this is like the third of fourth attempt to start wank there and every single time it turns out to be someone buttmad about the mods for some shitty and contrived reason.

they've got a really dedicated and really bootyblasted grudgewanker. bet it's gsai.

not that i put it past gee who shall not be named but why would they care about this game in particular

wasn't she supposed to be dying of cancer?

i know people can disguise how their type (or try to), but from what i remember about gsai, his writing isn't as clunky and awkward as some of the comments in this thread. not saying he's a good writer, i just don't remember his writing being quite as off in places.

but it's been a very long time since i've (knowingly) read anything written by gsai, so i could be wrong!

*how they type

I can see it as "Although I'm not a fan of her work" and "Even in a situation where I am not a fan of her work", so yes, it's not the best wording choice because of how easily it could be misunderstood. I do think in general, the line just felt unnecessary if only because a what-if approach just gives it a negative, insincere feeling.

da but I think it's more common that mods expect you to comment to the acceptance notice, then you add yourself to the comms. Form fill-ups usually come after (taken, ac top-level, rewards page, etc). I usually do all my forms after I join comms and don't even recall doing taken list first. i wouldn't be surprised if someone messed up a step as a result especially if they already got comm access.

because tai does shit like aggressively out the anon mods of a game they just dropped because it was closing in a way they disliked, and something something shipping

In fairness, one of those mods was breaking their own rules and bullying their own players to benefit and shield a harassing, lying pest just because they were shipping. The callout wasn’t undeserved. You’re not incorrect in your assessment of tai though.

you'll find most people don't agree with that, which might be why nobody liked the callout

in fairness, you have to provide evidence of this so-called "bullying" that made this callout deserved so people might actually start to believe you. as it is, tai is a manipulative asshole and has proven that they are still a manipulative asshole.

Since when was providing evidence ever needed when it came to shit mods

thats a target on your back

Since always? Deets are deets, if we demand them for any Tom, Dick or Harry we wank about why would we have a double standard when it comes to shitty mods?

nah you're right, the awkward syntax that sounds like a crying 8 year old typed it doesn't sound like gsai last I encountered him

wankers that are immediately identifiable for typing like this are dark and blue, off the top of my head

This is such a bizarre take. Do you think bad behavior is fine if there’s no mass uproar or public controversy over it? That harassment (and shielding harassers from consequences) is okay so long as enough people don’t care it happened?

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

Page 205 of 308

251: back in my day wank meant something

+1

Re: labyrinthum

Re: labyrinthum

Re: labyrinthum

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

Re: labyrinthum

Re: labyrinthum

no subject

Re: labyrinthum

Re: da

da

Re: da

no subject

Re: da

Re: da

no subject

Re: labyrinthum

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

Re: da

no subject