ryanongosling: (Default)
Ryan Gosling ([personal profile] ryanongosling) wrote in [community profile] wankgate2024-05-21 06:04 pm

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 10:20 am (UTC)(link)
Off topic but a comment down there reminded me, does anyone else feel like the players who ship with Tifa's characters get away with a lot more? Whether it's being flaky while holding a lot of important plot, or backseat modding. This has actually made me consider dropping more than the activity stuff.

da

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 10:21 am (UTC)(link)
wait is "clings to" cringe now

thinking back i guess it really has fallen out of my "talking to people online" vocabulary, but it still feels surprising to see it lumped in the same category as unironically calling people senpai "sempai."
do people think it means "clinging to your leg like a child" rather than just being a shorthand for a "i am holding you close (i.e. hugging)" sentiment?
is this an "XD is cringe" thing?

sorry for the slight digression i'm just having a moment over here

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 10:34 am (UTC)(link)
For me it becomes cringe when it's in almost *every fucking response* of LWP's to any time someone is having a bad day.

"Ugh I think something I ate made me sick"
In comes LWP to cling at them.

"Feeling kinda crummy, but don't want to talk about it rn"
LWP, clinging like a turd!

It's weirdly childish and invasive in my opinion, like going "glomps u" kinda levels.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 10:52 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt

can you like. elaborate on this. isn't NPCs being new characters (so: original characters) designed specifically for the game they're NPCs in… normal? and if they are plot-significant, it makes sense that they would have fleshed-out motivations and personalities.

or are you describing an issue where they are played just as actively as PCs, rather than being for special occasions and plot-significant moments? because normally i love getting cr with NPCs to the extent that "cr" is possible in that context—but if (based on other comments here about them replying to network posts) they are played as basically just elevated PCs, that would indeed be… well, weird at best.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 10:59 am (UTC)(link)
it's when the npc is obviously the mod's blorbo to the point of being an oc in all but name that it becomes cringe

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 11:09 am (UTC)(link)
judging by the above response it's definitely a "XD is cringe" thing

absolutely insane to call commenting on a mutual's plurk posts invasive

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 11:13 am (UTC)(link)
there actually is a really easy way to opt out of tagging a game's mod npcs

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 11:17 am (UTC)(link)
also lbr... a lot of us 90's gay/trans kids had a lot of internalized homophobia and yaoi/shounen-ai was exciting bc it was a safe way to explore/become familiar with queerness, as well as find community around it.

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 11:34 am (UTC)(link)
it probably did make it acceptable for it to appear in kid's media, though. rose/juleka would had torches and pitchforks outside disney's corporate offices just ten years ago.

nayrt

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 11:59 am (UTC)(link)
Digression, I guess, but in what way was ayrt ~defensive~

Have we really hit a level of brainlessness where someone pointing out you didn't get your facts right means they're getting defensive

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 11:59 am (UTC)(link)
just spotted them on the what's my type meme and had a laugh when i remembered this thread

i have never seen someone blindly barrel through that many obvious hooks just to slam down some boring exposition about their own character lol

Re: nayrt

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 12:03 pm (UTC)(link)
1. how they type has been brought up before
2. you are bullying. that's what we do here and that's what you are doing. sorry debra

that's all. i'm not interested in this brainless digression

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 12:03 pm (UTC)(link)
anon, ten years ago was 2014. the Obergefell decision was 2015. two side characters being in a gay relationship would have indeed been a big deal, but "torches and pitchforks" is extremely hyperbolic. 2014 was korrasami walking off into the proverbial sunset, for a point of comparison.

currently we are seeing a major conservative backlash, which is a discussion that is a whole different can of worms.

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 12:10 pm (UTC)(link)
today's conservative backlash would be an interesting discussion (maybe not for wg) but i really do wish we could all collectively agree to not comment on this thread instead of stopping to navel gaze up our own asses about how we helped to transform lgtb+ lives by enjoying sasunaru on a niche corner of the internet and never leaving our bedrooms

yes, maybe "yaoi" opened up your own personal horizons, but get some perspective please

Re: nayrt

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 12:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh honey, no, that was my first reply in this thread

I'm sorry people are picking on your friend right now but you really aren't shutting this down the way you seem to think you are, and I promise you it isn't a big deal to begin with, no one's going to be taking this to heart

It's a wankgate thread, there arent going to be ramifications for your buddy, you can relax

-1

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 12:26 pm (UTC)(link)
wow do *you* understand that bullying is what we do here? is2g

Re: nayrt

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 12:40 pm (UTC)(link)
general you, moron. i don't know them, i just think ppl jumping on wHiTeKnIGHt when someone disagrees with them on wg is fucking boring, just like you.

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 12:42 pm (UTC)(link)
yes i am aware, that's why i don't get defensive when someone says i'm bullying a guy on wankgate

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 12:47 pm (UTC)(link)
You are single handedly making this game look worse than the dumb ass rules they've implemented, but please keep going. I've been waiting for this game to crash and burn and you're really lighting a match.

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 12:49 pm (UTC)(link)
cool story, bro, meanwhile you're still the only one who's getting defensive lmao

you don't even know this person but tbh it would be less sad if you were defending someone else. instead you're what, getting this way bc people think your points are bad? who cares? you are a faceless anon on wg rn, why defend yourself when nobody knows who you are?

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 12:49 pm (UTC)(link)
lol

weird

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 12:50 pm (UTC)(link)
zzzzzzzz

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 01:00 pm (UTC)(link)
so is she "clinging" in the forget all that tag me way or "clinging" in the i am here to offer virtual hugs and support way?

because this sounds a lot like the latter and you are sounding more unhinged with every new comment.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 01:04 pm (UTC)(link)
*cling* not to be rude but have you sent the tag

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-08-20 01:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Can't speak to what the person you replied to meant, but what I see from her is a mix tbh.

Yes, clinging tends to be her default response to anybody's sad plurks.

Yes, with people she talks about wanting to ship with she's pushy and usually follows her clinging with the suggestion that maybe shippy threads would help, do they want that from her immediately.

When someone had a stressful work day, it's a nice offer. When someone's going through something big, it's very tonedeaf. It's nothing new in this hobby for some people not to understand that rp isn't always the top priority in someone's life, though. There's a whole thread on this post about how dare rpers have kids