ryanongosling: (Default)
Ryan Gosling ([personal profile] ryanongosling) wrote in [community profile] wankgate2024-05-21 06:04 pm

(Anonymous) 2024-09-08 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)
wait don't say that, you don't want to be a catey bitch do you?

Re: DWRP OPINIONS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT UNANON

(Anonymous) 2024-09-08 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)
i think you did it wrong anon

cuz ime that's def not the case

Re: DWRP OPINIONS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT UNANON

(Anonymous) 2024-09-08 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)
dude's prebanned from every coochie, probably

Re: DWRP OPINIONS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT UNANON

(Anonymous) 2024-09-08 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)
dwrp has a sexism problem but the imbalance between male characters rped and female characters rped is the least of it.

Re: DWRP OPINIONS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT UNANON

(Anonymous) 2024-09-08 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)
you hate writing in a writing hobby

Re: DWRP OPINIONS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT UNANON

(Anonymous) 2024-09-08 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm catty and want to hear more. what do you think the biggest problem is?

Re: DWRP OPINIONS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT UNANON

(Anonymous) 2024-09-08 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
why do you think they're RPing instead of writing a book? I think most of them know this

Re: DWRP OPINIONS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT UNANON

(Anonymous) 2024-09-08 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
this was years ago but iirc he was gay so I don't think he cared

Re: DWRP OPINIONS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT UNANON

(Anonymous) 2024-09-08 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
speak for yourself. there are tons of times i'll be on the fence about tagging a stranger's character on a meme, and whether they have any info in the journal ends up being the deciding factor. no info, i move on

esp if it's a castnate stating what their ships are in there from the get-go. love not having to do any "would you be into this pairing" song and dance before starting

+1

(Anonymous) 2024-09-08 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
if you can't take five minutes to write up even the most barebones of ship prefs/permissions/kinks, why should i waste my time tagging you and trying to figure out what you're interested in?

Re: WOULD YOU RATHER

(Anonymous) 2024-09-09 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
root canal, because i've already had to get one
root canals are less painful than modding a game

Re: DWRP OPINIONS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT UNANON

(Anonymous) 2024-09-09 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
wrong, sorry. if your info post isn't getting you more bites, there's something going on with it. there's a surprising number of journals out there with perfunctory permissions posts that don't actually say anything useful ("i'm fine with anything" is not useful)

Re: DWRP OPINIONS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT UNANON

(Anonymous) 2024-09-09 02:01 am (UTC)(link)
ime they were usually a bigger pain in the ass to mods than players

Re: DWRP OPINIONS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT UNANON

(Anonymous) 2024-09-09 02:05 am (UTC)(link)
i'm not tagging an oc without a decent info post or top-level

Re: WOULD YOU RATHER

(Anonymous) 2024-09-09 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
honestly the only thing i hate about root canals is the cost. i had one for the first time a while back and it wasn't nearly as bad as i expected

Re: DWRP OPINIONS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT UNANON

(Anonymous) 2024-09-09 04:44 am (UTC)(link)
i give everyone who wants cr or threads a chance. Every single cismale rper has turned out to be some manner of over-invested, egoistical or a creep.

i do not want to pin this sort of behavior on gender lines because there are terrible and creepy women here, but the cismen here are overwhelmingly like that.

Re: DWRP OPINIONS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT UNANON

(Anonymous) 2024-09-09 05:37 am (UTC)(link)
this seems less in defense of ocs and more like a reason to nuke isekai as a genre from space

i'd also support nuking shounen anime if anyone has a kickstarter for that

op

(Anonymous) 2024-09-09 06:44 am (UTC)(link)
yeah but my point is that having the info post in and of itself isn't what sparked your interest enough to make you stop and consider the character at all. you liked the look of the character (whether bc of the canon, character pick, username, icon, whatever) first, enough to check out their info post.

Re: op

(Anonymous) 2024-09-09 08:42 am (UTC)(link)
and if i'm not seeing an info post, i'm still moving right along.

Re: op

(Anonymous) 2024-09-09 09:05 am (UTC)(link)
the point you actually wrote was "it won't get you more tags," which is wrong.

i stop, consider the character, and check for info. no info, no tag.

Re: op

(Anonymous) 2024-09-09 09:36 am (UTC)(link)
yep i stand by it, it won't get you more tags, it will just inform the people who were thinking of tagging you anyway.

by your own comment, you stop and consider the character first before you even check for an info post.

i'm saying this because people like to act as if info posts are end-all-be-all but reality is, you still have to play from a canon with mass appeal or a considerable niche one, or you've got to have a juicy idea pillaring your oc. info posts can make the deciding factor between you and the next guy playing Blorbo, but they won't do the whole job of getting you more tags and it feels weird to me we authoritatively prescribe them as the savior of dwrp here and on rpa. but hey, that's why i'm posting this under the unpopular opinion thread, i get plenty of you feel differently.

Re: op

(Anonymous) 2024-09-09 09:42 am (UTC)(link)
that's a lot of words to express that you can't tell the difference between getting and not getting a tag

Re: DWRP OPINIONS YOU WOULD NEVER ADMIT UNANON

(Anonymous) 2024-09-09 09:53 am (UTC)(link)
da

personally if a journal doesn't have an info post i might take a swing at tagging them just to see what happens. but if it has an info post that tells me they don't like the ship or is just badly written with bad takes on the character i won't tag them. so in my case having an info post is more likely to result in them not getting a tag compared to the times that they do! which is how it's supposed to work i think.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-09-09 09:56 am (UTC)(link)
it's blizzarding, you entitled twat.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-09-09 10:07 am (UTC)(link)
stop posting from antarctica then. don't you have science to be doing down there?