wankgate | 251: back in my day wank meant something

251: back in my day wank meant something

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

literally the entirety of dreamwidth's userbase are on good terms with denise about stuff like asking about downtime. kit just wants to think she's ~special~

zionism is a poison

people have a bad habit of blaming others for their own decisions to click on content warned links around here. if the thumbnail wasn't graphic and the video had a content warning, that's on you for clicking.

have people learned literally nothing from the early days of the internet about clicking on stuff at random

if you're making it someone else's problem to deal with whether you're anxious about getting tags from others or anxious about the pace you get tags out to others, yes

i've seen people on both sides of the line behave like this in this hobby and both need to step away from the screen and do other things

so it was not warned for + had a deceptive thumbnail then? Because if you tell someone what is in it, it is not a jumpscare.

ever seen a friendship dissolve in real time?

i remember two rp best friends constantly gushing over a shared fandom of theirs around a decade ago. eventually they said they'd meet up irl because said fandom had a movie and they were gonna see it together.

come one of their next plurks after that meetup, friend A was noticeably terse and even cold to friend B. as the weeks went by it was obvious they were no longer as warm and fangirl-y with each other as they'd used to be. almost like the meetup had been a huge letdown.

i fell out with both of them a few years later as we all moved onto different games and circles. but last i checked they're no longer friends.

I agree with this tbh. Once or twice every few months? Fine. But if it's a near constant basis (some people do it like twice a week), I unfollow them and tbh lose interest in tagging them because they keep whining. If they didn't, I probably wouldn't have noticed they haven't tagged back because not everyone tags back at the same pace. I'd still tag someone giving me tags once a month because I want to, but if I felt they did this performative "people must hate me for tagging so slow" I'd just drop them because that's more annoying than just tagging back slowly.

got any actual deets here or just vaguing? i wanna know who this is

whoa hold up

denise rps???

some of you never got goatsed when you were young and impressionable and it really shows

the icons at the side goes to the communities. the pop up box that says NAVIGATION goes to the navigation. the start button goes to the profile. I'm on mobile with nav bar turned off and I got around just fine. what else does a mod journal need to have? all the communities with content, and the info pages, are fully readable.

not these days, but she used to

there was some discussion on this here or at rpa, i forgot which

for best results, assume they're also actually stupid

Did you mean gangbusters nonny

there is no reason to think that they aren't actually friends, there's just no reason to think that denise would watch wankgate. that was definitely conspiracy theoryville, but they probably are friends

that kind of thing is so unpleasant to witness.

definitely a used to, and she initially joined to be able to understand the dw rp spaces better! she liked rp and would probably do it again

This is the better police

LMAO I hadn't noticed gangbangers until I saw this comment

It is and so is bringing RL atrocities into an RP fun space. I hate Zionism but don't want to be talking about it here and I sure don't want to be seeing horrible videos from Gaza on Plurk.

some of these people are still young and impressionable. if you're under 30 you can leave.

no i mean gangbangers because i have wicked whims downloaded

plurk is a social media site, not an "rp fun place." get over it, you baby

i find this comment funny because i just posted on rpa about downloading sims 4 today with wicked whims. perv bros.

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

Page 75 of 308

251: back in my day wank meant something

Re: da

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(frozen comment) +1

(frozen comment) +1

no subject

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

no subject

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

Re: da

(frozen comment) Re: +1

Re: da

Re: da

Re: da

Re: DRAGON AGE

Re: da

no subject

+1

no subject

Re: DRAGON AGE

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(frozen comment) Re: +1

Re: DRAGON AGE

(frozen comment) da

Re: DRAGON AGE