251: back in my day wank meant something

[ryanongosling]

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.

Keep the rules in mind.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves

Report stupid shit here.

Comments

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

[(Anonymous)]

as a prospective player, i don't like it, but i completely understand why they chose to do it like this and i don't think they were going to find a solution that made everyone happy and didn't drown them in work. i'm not going to bother trying to app anymore, but honestly, i think that's for the best for me and the game. they have a set group of players and an atmosphere they're happy with and that makes me feel like it would have been an uphill struggle for someone who didn't have a friend group going in.

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

[(Anonymous)]

+1

everyone's acting like this is a bad decision because it means the game is less likely to pick up randos who just want to sling in an app because the game is popular. maybe the mods are happy with their playerbase and want to keep it. not every game is going to be available to everyone.

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

[(Anonymous)]

can we please focus on the issue that actually matters here

now we can't slip into the game and leak things to chortle fatly over here

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

[(Anonymous)]

i do genuinely wonder if this decision was partly because of that one anon who bragged about doing this on here

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

[(Anonymous)]

well it's all you guys' faults for having more than 7k comments last thread

i mean i can't make a boast like that and not follow through, next time have maybe half the e-beggar wank and we'll be lucky to break 5k

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

[(Anonymous)]

dwbi i'll toss you an invite

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

[(Anonymous)]

sure bb

hit me up at onlyg

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

[(Anonymous)]

ngl a cynical part of me immediately thought they're just sick of the anon commentary lately and want to choke it since invite-only games can't be discussed in anon comms.

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

[(Anonymous)]

slight correction

they CAN be, we just can't fish for wank about them

if we've got solid deets that shit's going down in there (without breaking dreamwidth's TOS by leaking the contents of a locked entry), we can post it