Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
all of you are judging this character so much but the reason people tag them back is because they have fairly decent tags and are consistent. that's more than i can say for a lot of rpers.

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
ok if you've played with them so much whats the ic explanation for a an adult robot that IDs as male to have a huge titty female avatar that's 15

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 01:45 am (UTC)(link)
tbh nothing i care about. i rp to rp, not to judge people's choice of pbs.

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
ok but i want to rp with people who make solid decisions based on the character history and personality, not just "i picked a tittified high school girl because i think it's sexy and has no ic basis"

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
it's a good thing no one is forcing you to tag them then

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
so there is no ic basis. thanks for confirming

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 01:57 am (UTC)(link)
my original point was people tag them because they actually tag back. sorry people don't want to invite you i guess?

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 02:01 am (UTC)(link)
i'm actually already in the game, i just want character concepts made for bakerstreet/tlh to stay there

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
it's a good thing no one is forcing you to tag them then

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 02:15 am (UTC)(link)
dude you're playing in a sex game

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
fwiw i agree with you but people are going to argue this issue anyway. to me, there's a line between rping a character in a sex game in an IC, believable way... and rping against what is clearly a manifestation of someone's OOC fetish.

it's not a clear line, hence why people will argue it. but in the case of this soundwave i just don't want to engage with what, to me, looks less like an IC character choice and more like an OOC fetish.

i'd honestly be surprised if they got into the game myself, but we'll see.

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) - 2024-06-03 03:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) - 2024-06-03 05:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) - 2024-06-03 06:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) - 2024-06-03 07:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) - 2024-06-03 08:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) - 2024-06-03 08:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) - 2024-06-03 13:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) - 2024-06-03 13:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) - 2024-06-03 19:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) - 2024-06-03 22:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) - 2024-06-03 22:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) - 2024-06-03 03:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) - 2024-06-03 04:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 11:30 am (UTC)(link)
if you don't want to play with concepts created for tlh i have bad news about your magic jamjar sex hotel

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) - 2024-06-03 11:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) - 2024-06-03 13:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) - 2024-06-03 13:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) - 2024-06-03 13:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) - 2024-06-03 14:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
i believe they have femboy icons now

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
https://v.dreamwidth.org/17176930/2553667

not quite. looks like they're taking hololive fanart instead

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 01:55 am (UTC)(link)
why not

is it really any different then some dude in a mmorpg making a hot girl character to play as

da

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 02:26 am (UTC)(link)
it is kinda odd to app a canon character and then play them in a form that has no basis in canon for like 80% of your threads, and to repeat this in every game you bring them to. just seems like the player should make an oc instead.

+1

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
nyart

i agree with this. i am also wondering if their "holo avatar" is even workable within the setting of the game since it's not canon.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 02:45 am (UTC)(link)
https://tfwiki.net/wiki/Bishoujo_Series

“transformers but cute girl” is absolutely a canon thing. i don’t think these have actually appeared as characters, but there is a basis for this.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 02:49 am (UTC)(link)
i am absolutely busting a gut over the fact someone might think a line of scale figures is actually canon, and soundwave isn't even listed as one of the characters

thank you anon

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 03:27 am (UTC)(link)
oh you're the very special kind of pedantic stupid nerd. i would say you must be fun at parties, but that would require friends to invite you.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
are you fr? you think a sensible mod team should accept that as "canon"?

do you still live in 2006

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
i never said it was canon. someone said there's not any canon basis except we have hasbro with the line of "but what if they were cute anime girls" figurines, so it's not like it's an idea completely spun out of nowhere

it's also less weird than kiss players

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2024-07-06 15:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2024-07-06 15:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 11:40 am (UTC)(link)
tbf a lot of male characters in that continuity arbitrarily had female avatars

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 11:43 am (UTC)(link)
but it seems like soundwave didn't or else they wouldn't be using vtuber icons, right?

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-06-03 11:55 am (UTC)(link)
soundwave was never seen using a holomatter avatar at all and i don't really care about what that implies for the larger discussion. i'm just saying there's no particular "avatar gender matches robot gender" precedent like airt seemed to be assuming.