Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-30 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
it was fucking tai.

space catboy 大変
even if i wasn't a fan of her work, that's always a horrible loss to go through, she has all my empathy. replurked :-(


foxtrots on plurk.

fucking disgusting. like what is wrong with you???

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-30 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
so it's okay to morally grandstand on wank-outing others, but they don't need scruples when it comes to talking about someone losing a child?

real nice. /s

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-30 02:13 am (UTC)(link)
fucking idiot. they really needed to make some moral grandstanding over RP CODING. wouldn't want all that "empathy" to rub off on those undeserving codes

that's another one for the blacklist

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-30 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
ok so I’ve never seen this person but giving the benefit of the doubt since I’m in a forgiving mood this evening: is it possible what they meant was ‘I wasn’t familiar with their work’ and just phrased it horrendously?

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-30 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
no

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-30 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
nope

it's definitely a case of 'i need my opinion stated but also sorry that happened to you i guess'

tonedeaf

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-30 04:04 am (UTC)(link)
no

one, no one doesn't know tessisamess in this community. just about every game community has something of hers or based on hers, and is credited. saying "i'm not familiar with her work" is bullshit and you should call them out.

two, tai doesn't mince words. they say exactly what they mean to say and no one is an exception. never be in a forgiving mood when it comes to them, they're a piece of shit.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-30 07:49 am (UTC)(link)
this is the same person who outed anon mods because they were mad that a game they literally just dropped was closing.

they do not deserve your benefit of the doubt. this is just how they normally are.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-30 10:37 am (UTC)(link)
tai has historically disparaged tess codes because jamie used them all the time. tai is also someone who means exactly what they say, so i'm seconding other anons who say they don't need your charitable doubt

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-30 02:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Anon there is nothing in their remark to give the benefit of the doubt to.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-30 02:24 am (UTC)(link)
wtf what even is their problem with her codes?? I’d love to know

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-30 05:28 am (UTC)(link)
+1 i wanna know too as someone who codes

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-30 07:53 am (UTC)(link)
i can't speak for tai, but i personally don't like how complicated some of the codes usually are.

that said, it's a personal preference and i sure as fuck wouldn't feel the need to voice that in a plurk about that person's dead child.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-30 04:06 am (UTC)(link)
i have no idea why people are still fine with being around them when they always act like an asshole. christ, what a terrible thing to say.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-30 05:12 am (UTC)(link)
i'm not a fan of tess' codes either but this is absolutely not the time or place to say it, their child died under what seems to be undetermined circumstances

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-30 05:20 am (UTC)(link)
you did say it weirdo

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-31 05:33 am (UTC)(link)
yeah a wankgate bitching thread is basically the same as a fundraising plurk run by the person who just lost a child

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-31 10:26 am (UTC)(link)
dude, just don't

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-30 05:21 am (UTC)(link)
sighs

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-07-30 08:50 am (UTC)(link)
oh it was tai, that explains it