251: back in my day wank meant something

[ryanongosling]

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.

Keep the rules in mind.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves

Report stupid shit here.

Comments

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

ok so I’ve never seen this person but giving the benefit of the doubt since I’m in a forgiving mood this evening: is it possible what they meant was ‘I wasn’t familiar with their work’ and just phrased it horrendously?

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

no

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

nope

it's definitely a case of 'i need my opinion stated but also sorry that happened to you i guess'

tonedeaf

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

no

one, no one doesn't know tessisamess in this community. just about every game community has something of hers or based on hers, and is credited. saying "i'm not familiar with her work" is bullshit and you should call them out.

two, tai doesn't mince words. they say exactly what they mean to say and no one is an exception. never be in a forgiving mood when it comes to them, they're a piece of shit.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

this is the same person who outed anon mods because they were mad that a game they literally just dropped was closing.

they do not deserve your benefit of the doubt. this is just how they normally are.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

tai has historically disparaged tess codes because jamie used them all the time. tai is also someone who means exactly what they say, so i'm seconding other anons who say they don't need your charitable doubt

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

[(Anonymous)]

Anon there is nothing in their remark to give the benefit of the doubt to.