Ryan Gosling (
ryanongosling) wrote in
wankgate2024-05-21 06:04 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
251: back in my day wank meant something

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.
Keep the rules in mind.
LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE
Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report stupid shit here.
Re: labyrinthum
(Anonymous) 2024-08-02 04:19 pm (UTC)(link)mod teams often have an idea of which journals should be accepted into comms after apps have been processed. it's not unreasonable that the mod team would accept a character journal before a taken list comment is made because 99% of the time the comment gets made within the same hour/day/week of acceptance.
should the mods have notified the player first? sure, it would've been a courtesy, but they shouldn't have to when the 'comment to the taken list' step is included in the acceptance notes already. just appeal the mod decision instead of making a stink about it.
Re: labyrinthum
(Anonymous) 2024-08-02 04:27 pm (UTC)(link)It’s been a tough month for some people, showing a little bit of courtesy wouldn’t hurt on the mods behalf.
Unfortunately, Ref just cemented they can never come back to Lab after dragging this whole mess here. It’s ban on sight after this.
Re: labyrinthum
(Anonymous) 2024-08-02 04:37 pm (UTC)(link)https://buttrinthum.dreamwidth.org/17466.html?thread=13534522#cmt13534522
either way, it really isn't asking too much for a new player to the game to get a single reminder from the mods, and per the above, apparently the mods themselves agreed. the player has been allowed to return to the game without reapplying or any other penalties. honestly? good on the lab mods for doing so. this whole discussion just made me feel bad for them, because their playerbase seems to be foaming at the mouth, be it against the mods or in defense of them...
Re: labyrinthum
(Anonymous) 2024-08-02 04:58 pm (UTC)(link)they come out of it not looking too bad, anyway. there's no proof that anyone anonposting here is in the game at all so i wouldn't worry too much if i were them.
+1
(Anonymous) 2024-08-02 05:15 pm (UTC)(link)Re: labyrinthum
(Anonymous) 2024-08-02 05:38 pm (UTC)(link)isn't that how ac works like i'm
Re: labyrinthum
(Anonymous) 2024-08-02 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)Re: labyrinthum
(Anonymous) 2024-08-02 06:57 pm (UTC)(link)Re: labyrinthum
(Anonymous) 2024-08-02 04:41 pm (UTC)(link)if op isn't ref then they're sure giving ref a terrible look and making things 10x worse for them. and also making the playerbase look like a bunch of harpies who'll throw an anon fit at the slightest misstep instead of actually bringing up any concerns with their mods, yikes
Re: labyrinthum
(Anonymous) 2024-08-02 04:56 pm (UTC)(link)it doesn't matter how many times the truth was said right from the horse's mouth, either, about not being ref and not being upset ref was swept. of course it was all ref, obviously, not someone else in the game who didn't like ref, never wanted them accepted, and has beef with the oth mods.
you're all very stupid.
Re: labyrinthum
(Anonymous) 2024-08-02 05:08 pm (UTC)(link)Re: labyrinthum
(Anonymous) 2024-08-02 05:13 pm (UTC)(link)Re: labyrinthum
(Anonymous) 2024-08-02 05:22 pm (UTC)(link)Re: labyrinthum
(Anonymous) 2024-08-02 05:23 pm (UTC)(link)you're clogging up flatview with the most banal shit i've ever seen
Re: labyrinthum
(Anonymous) 2024-08-02 05:38 pm (UTC)(link)No wonder people don't want to mod anymore.
Re: labyrinthum
(Anonymous) 2024-08-02 05:39 pm (UTC)(link)of what, of wankgate?
Re: labyrinthum
(Anonymous) 2024-08-02 05:23 pm (UTC)(link)